Data as of Nov 4, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

MINT vs SPHQ: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, MINT returned +4.2% to SPHQ's +16.8%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about MINT and SPHQ

Net assets: $16.4bn on Jun 30, 2026 for PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active Exchange-Traded Fund, and $18.6bn on Nov 3, 2026 for Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF.

At a glance
+4.2%
MINT total return, 1 year
+16.8%
SPHQ total return, 1 year
0.36%
MINT expense ratio
0.15%
SPHQ expense ratio

Pair scorecard

SPHQ costs 0.21 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 12.6 points.

MINT vs SPHQ: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureMINTSPHQ
Return
Total return, 1 year+4.2%+16.8%
Drawdown
Below its high5.9%, high on Jun 30, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksNo index, actively managedS&P 500 Quality Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.36%0.15%
Net assets, MINT as of Jun 30, 2026 and SPHQ as of Nov 3, 2026$16.4bn$18.6bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight100%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund44.1%

Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, MINT and SPHQ hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Nov 3, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first MINT SPHQ
Only in one fund ↓
Only in MINT
United States Treasury 6.21%
Fannie Mae 1.12%
Freddie Mac 0.99%
SUMISHO AIR LEASE CORP 0.87%
HSBC HOLDINGS PLC 0.77%
AERCAP IRELAND CAP/GLOBA 0.77%
Trillium Credit Card Trust II 0.71%
INTL BK RECON & DEVELOP 0.70%
Only in SPHQ
Mastercard Inc 6.68%
Visa Inc 6.56%
Apple Inc 5.74%
Costco Wholesale Corp 4.39%
GE Vernova Inc 3.93%
General Electric Co 3.61%
Cisco Systems Inc 3.40%
Netflix Inc 3.36%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

MINT PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active Exchange-Traded Fund SPHQ Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF
Where it sits Bond ETF Stock ETF
Issuer PIMCO Invesco
What it is Actively managed Tracks the S&P 500 Quality
Total return, 1 year +4.2% +16.8%
Its benchmark over the same days not measured +14.8% (IVV)
Gap to its benchmark not measured +2.0 pts vs IVV
Expense ratio 0.36% 0.15%
Holdings 977 102
Net assets, MINT as of Jun 30, 2026 and SPHQ as of Nov 3, 2026 $16.4bn $18.6bn

MINT and SPHQ on the fields both publish, as of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

SPHQ flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
MINT

MINT is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 it returned +4.2% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.36% a year.

SPHQ

SPHQ tracks the S&P 500 Quality. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 it returned +16.8% with distributions reinvested, against +14.8% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Nov 3, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 102 positions, with the top ten at 44.1%. It sat 5.9% below its high of Jun 30, 2026 on Nov 4, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, MINT or SPHQ?
In the year to Nov 4, 2026, with distributions reinvested, MINT returned +4.2% and SPHQ +16.8%.
Which is cheaper, MINT or SPHQ?
SPHQ is cheaper, by 0.21 percentage points a year. That is about $21 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, MINT against SPHQ, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/mint-vs-sphq

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.