Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

MINT vs QUAL: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, MINT returned +4.2% to QUAL's +13.1%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about MINT and QUAL

Net assets: $16.4bn on Jun 30, 2026 for PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active Exchange-Traded Fund, and $48.2bn on Oct 28, 2026 for iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF.

At a glance
+4.2%
MINT total return, 1 year
+13.1%
QUAL total return, 1 year
0.36%
MINT expense ratio
0.15%
QUAL expense ratio

Pair scorecard

QUAL costs 0.21 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 8.9 points.

MINT vs QUAL: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureMINTQUAL
Return
Total return, 1 year+4.2%+13.1%
Benchmark
What it tracksNo index, actively managedMSCI USA Sector Neutral Quality Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.36%0.15%
Net assets, MINT as of Jun 30, 2026 and QUAL as of Oct 28, 2026$16.4bn$48.2bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight97%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund44.5%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, MINT and QUAL hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first MINT QUAL
Only in one fund ↓
Only in MINT
United States Treasury 6.21%
Fannie Mae 1.12%
Freddie Mac 0.99%
SUMISHO AIR LEASE CORP 0.87%
HSBC HOLDINGS PLC 0.77%
AERCAP IRELAND CAP/GLOBA 0.77%
Trillium Credit Card Trust II 0.71%
INTL BK RECON & DEVELOP 0.70%
Only in QUAL
MICROSOFT 8.09%
APPLE 7.38%
NVIDIA 6.28%
META PLATFORMS CLASS A 4.06%
ELI LILLY 4.04%
TJX 3.50%
VISA CLASS A 3.44%
LAM RESEARCH 2.84%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

MINT PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active Exchange-Traded Fund QUAL iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF
Where it sits Bond ETF Stock ETF
Issuer PIMCO iShares
What it is Actively managed Tracks the MSCI USA Quality Factor
Total return, 1 year +4.2% +13.1%
Its benchmark over the same days not measured +13.6% (MLRG)
Gap to its benchmark not measured −0.5 pts vs MLRG
Expense ratio 0.36% 0.15%
Holdings 977 119
Net assets, MINT as of Jun 30, 2026 and QUAL as of Oct 28, 2026 $16.4bn $48.2bn

MINT and QUAL on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

QUAL flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
MINT

MINT is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +4.2% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.36% a year.

QUAL

QUAL tracks the MSCI USA Quality Factor. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +13.1% with distributions reinvested, against +13.6% for its benchmark, the MSCI USA Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 97% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 119 positions, with the top ten at 44.5%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, MINT or QUAL?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, MINT returned +4.2% and QUAL +13.1%.
Which is cheaper, MINT or QUAL?
QUAL is cheaper, by 0.21 percentage points a year. That is about $21 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, MINT against QUAL, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/mint-vs-qual

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.