Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

MINT vs MTUM: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, MINT returned +4.2% to MTUM's +18.4%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about MINT and MTUM

Net assets: $16.4bn on Jun 30, 2026 for PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active Exchange-Traded Fund, and $18.7bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF.

At a glance
+4.2%
MINT total return, 1 year
+18.4%
MTUM total return, 1 year
0.36%
MINT expense ratio
0.15%
MTUM expense ratio

Pair scorecard

MTUM costs 0.21 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 14.2 points.

MINT vs MTUM: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureMINTMTUM
Return
Total return, 1 year+4.2%+18.4%
Drawdown
Below its high11.9%, high on Jun 22, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksNo index, actively managedMSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.36%0.15%
Net assets, MINT as of Jun 30, 2026 and MTUM as of Oct 27, 2026$16.4bn$18.7bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight93%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund35.5%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, MINT and MTUM hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first MINT MTUM
Only in one fund ↓
Only in MINT
United States Treasury 6.21%
Fannie Mae 1.12%
Freddie Mac 0.99%
SUMISHO AIR LEASE CORP 0.87%
HSBC HOLDINGS PLC 0.77%
AERCAP IRELAND CAP/GLOBA 0.77%
Trillium Credit Card Trust II 0.71%
INTL BK RECON & DEVELOP 0.70%
Only in MTUM
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES 6.06%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY 5.00%
INTEL CORPORATION 3.92%
CISCO SYSTEMS INC 3.64%
JOHNSON & JOHNSON 3.45%
EXXONMOBIL HOLDINGS CORP 2.96%
PALO ALTO NETWORKS 2.88%
ALPHABET CLASS A 2.62%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

MINT PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active Exchange-Traded Fund MTUM iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF
Where it sits Bond ETF Stock ETF
Issuer PIMCO iShares
What it is Actively managed Tracks the MSCI USA Momentum Factor
Total return, 1 year +4.2% +18.4%
Its benchmark over the same days not measured +13.6% (MLRG)
Gap to its benchmark not measured +4.8 pts vs MLRG
Expense ratio 0.36% 0.15%
Holdings 977 126
Net assets, MINT as of Jun 30, 2026 and MTUM as of Oct 27, 2026 $16.4bn $18.7bn

MINT and MTUM on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

MTUM flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
MINT

MINT is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +4.2% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.36% a year.

MTUM

MTUM tracks the MSCI USA Momentum Factor. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +18.4% with distributions reinvested, against +13.6% for its benchmark, the MSCI USA Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 93% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 126 positions, with the top ten at 35.5%. It sat 11.9% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, MINT or MTUM?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, MINT returned +4.2% and MTUM +18.4%.
Which is cheaper, MINT or MTUM?
MTUM is cheaper, by 0.21 percentage points a year. That is about $21 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, MINT against MTUM, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/mint-vs-mtum

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.