Which returned more over the last year, IWB or USFR?

In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IWB returned +16.7% and USFR returned +4.1%, so IWB returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, IWB or USFR?

IWB charges 0.15% a year and USFR charges 0.15%, so IWB is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

IWB vs USFR: how they differ

IWB and USFR hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and IWB returned more over the year.

iShares Russell 1000 ETF and WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, IWB and USFR hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in IWB	Only in USFR
NVIDIA 7.26%	UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE 28.04%
APPLE 6.73%	UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE 28.01%
MICROSOFT 5.21%	UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE 28.00%
AMAZON.COM INC 3.49%	UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE 15.95%
ALPHABET CLASS A 2.77%
BROADCOM INC 2.40%
ALPHABET CLASS C 2.24%
META PLATFORMS CLASS A 2.02%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Sep 10, 2026.

IWB and USFR on the fields both publish, as of Sep 13, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	IWB iShares Russell 1000 ETF	USFR WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	iShares	WisdomTree
What it is	Russell 1000	Floating Rate Treasury
Total return, 1 year	+16.7%	+4.1%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	−0.8 pts	−13.4 pts
Expense ratio	0.15%	0.15%
Holdings	945	4

IWB in plain words

IWB is an index equity fund tracking the Russell 1000. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +16.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 945 positions, with the top ten at 35.2%.

USFR in plain words

USFR is a bond fund tracking the Floating Rate Treasury. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +4.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IWB or USFR?: In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IWB returned +16.7% and USFR returned +4.1%, so IWB returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, IWB or USFR?: IWB charges 0.15% a year and USFR charges 0.15%, so IWB is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

IWB against USFR, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 13, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, IWB against USFR, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwb-vs-usfr Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources