Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
IWB vs PDBC: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, IWB returned +13.1% to PDBC's +55.6%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about IWB and PDBC
Net assets: $49.1bn on Oct 28, 2026 for iShares Russell 1000 ETF, and $8.0bn on Oct 27, 2026 for Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF.
Pair scorecard
IWB costs 0.44 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 42.5 points; IWB is 6.0 times larger.
| Measure | IWB | PDBC |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +13.1% | +55.6% |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Russell 1000 Index | No index, actively managed |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.15% | 0.59% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 26, 2026 | $48.7bn | $8.1bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
| In the S&P 500, by weight | 92% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 35.3% | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, IWB and PDBC hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
IWB and PDBC on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
IWB
IWB tracks the Russell 1000. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +13.1% with distributions reinvested, against +13.2% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,025 positions, with the top ten at 35.3%.
PDBC
PDBC is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +55.6% with distributions reinvested, against +54.6% for its benchmark, the DBIQ Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Index Excess Return. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.59% a year.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, IWB or PDBC?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IWB returned +13.1% and PDBC +55.6%.
- Which is cheaper, IWB or PDBC?
- IWB is cheaper, by 0.44 percentage points a year. That is about $44 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, IWB against PDBC, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwb-vs-pdbc
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). IWB against PDBC. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwb-vs-pdbc
[IWB against PDBC (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwb-vs-pdbc)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.