Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

DYNF vs PDBC: how they differ

DYNF and PDBC hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and PDBC returned more over the year.

iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF and Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, DYNF and PDBC hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in DYNFOnly in PDBC
NVIDIA 8.13%Invesco Premier US Government Money Port 75.58%
APPLE 7.62%POWERSHARES CAYMAN FUND 24.42%
MICROSOFT 4.75%
AMAZON.COM INC 4.09%
JPMORGAN CHASE & CO 3.46%
EXXONMOBIL HOLDINGS CORP 2.73%
BROADCOM INC 2.59%
META PLATFORMS CLASS A 2.42%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 10, 2026.

DYNF and PDBC on the fields both publish, as of Sep 13, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
DYNF
iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF
PDBC
Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesInvesco
What it isU.S. Equity Factor Rotation ActiveOptimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy
Total return, 1 year+20.8%+55.2%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+3.3 pts+37.7 pts
Expense ratio0.26%0.59%
Already in the S&P 50098.8%0.0%
Holdings2342

DYNF in plain words

DYNF is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +20.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.26% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 99% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 234 positions, with the top ten at 40.3%.

PDBC in plain words

PDBC is an index equity fund tracking the Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +55.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.59% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2 positions, with the top ten at 100.0%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, DYNF or PDBC?
In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DYNF returned +20.8% and PDBC returned +55.2%, so PDBC returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, DYNF or PDBC?
DYNF charges 0.26% a year and PDBC charges 0.59%, so DYNF is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do DYNF and PDBC overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 99% of DYNF and 0% of PDBC by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

DYNF against PDBC, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 13, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, DYNF against PDBC, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/dynf-vs-pdbc Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources