Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
HGER vs IWB: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, HGER returned +46.9% to IWB's +13.1%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about HGER and IWB
Net assets on Oct 28, 2026: $5.0bn for Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy ETF and $49.1bn for iShares Russell 1000 ETF.
Pair scorecard
IWB costs 0.53 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 33.8 points; IWB is 9.8 times larger.
| Measure | HGER | IWB |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +46.9% | +13.1% |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Quantix Commodity Index | Russell 1000 Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.68% | 0.15% |
| Net assets | $5.0bn | $49.1bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 35.3% | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, HGER and IWB hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
HGER and IWB on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
HGER
HGER tracks an index of Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +46.9% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.68% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 0 positions, with the top ten at not published.
IWB
IWB tracks the Russell 1000. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +13.1% with distributions reinvested, against +13.2% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,025 positions, with the top ten at 35.3%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, HGER or IWB?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, HGER returned +46.9% and IWB +13.1%.
- Which is cheaper, HGER or IWB?
- IWB is cheaper, by 0.53 percentage points a year. That is about $53 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, HGER against IWB, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/hger-vs-iwb
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). HGER against IWB. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/hger-vs-iwb
[HGER against IWB (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/hger-vs-iwb)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.