Which returned more over the last year, IVV or NOBL?

In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IVV returned +13.7% and NOBL +15.5%.

Which is cheaper, IVV or NOBL?

IVV is cheaper, by 0.32 percentage points a year. That is about $32 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

How much do IVV and NOBL overlap with the S&P 500?

By their latest filed holdings, 100% of IVV and 98% of NOBL by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

Across categories

IVV vs NOBL: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share on X Download as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, IVV returned +13.7% to NOBL's +15.5%; 11% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about IVV and NOBL

Net assets: $885.1bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares Core S&P 500 ETF, and $11.6bn on Oct 28, 2026 for ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF.

IVV on its own →NOBL on its own →

At a glance

+13.7%

IVV total return, 1 year

+15.5%

NOBL total return, 1 year

0.03%

IVV expense ratio

0.35%

NOBL expense ratio

Pair scorecard

IVV costs 0.32 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 1.8 points; IVV is far larger, $885.1bn against $11.7bn.

IVV vs NOBL: Differences, Returns & Fees
Measure	IVV	NOBL
Return
Measure	IVV	NOBL
Total return, 1 year	+13.7%	+15.5%
Benchmark
Measure	IVV	NOBL
What it tracks	S&P 500	S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Index
Cost and size
Measure	IVV	NOBL
Expense ratio	0.03%	0.35%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026	$885.1bn	$11.7bn
Holdings
Measure	IVV	NOBL
Holdings in common	11%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund	38.1%	17.0%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Oct 18, 2013 to Oct 23, 2026 · 679 weekly returns

IVV NOBL

Return

Total return edge IVV +445.8% +264.8%

Annualized edge IVV +13.9% +10.4%

Price return edge IVV +335.3% +179.1%

Risk

Volatility edge NOBL (slight) 16.1% 15.4%

Max drawdown edge Tie −31.8% −31.7%

Risk-adjusted

Sharpe edge IVV 0.77 0.59

Sortino edge IVV 1.10 0.84

Calmar edge IVV 0.44 0.33

Reading

IVV returned more: +445.8% to +264.8%. NOBL swung slightly less: 15.4% to 16.1%. IVV and NOBL fell about the same at their worst: −31.8% and −31.7%.

Full scorecard

9 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓

Risk and return: IVV vs NOBL: Differences, Returns & Fees
Measure	IVV	NOBL	Edge	How it is measured
Return
Total return	+445.8%	+264.8%	IVV	Price change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized	+13.9%	+10.4%	IVV	Total return as a yearly rate.
Price return	+335.3%	+179.1%	IVV	Price change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility	16.1%	15.4%	NOBL (slight)	Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation	11.2%	10.8%	NOBL (slight)	Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown	−31.8%	−31.7%	Tie	Deepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe	0.77	0.59	IVV	Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino	1.10	0.84	IVV	Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Calmar	0.44	0.33	IVV	Annualized return divided by the max drawdown.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 679 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

11%

By the books each fund has filed, IVV and NOBL hold 11% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.

50%

0 half 100%

half

11% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first IVV NOBL

EXXONMOBIL HOLDINGS CORP 1.11% 1.63%

JOHNSON & JOHNSON 0.97% 1.47%

WALMART 0.80% 1.53%

ABBVIE 0.76% 1.58%

CHEVRON 0.68% 1.66%

PROCTER & GAMBLE 0.56% 1.50%

COCA-COLA 0.53% 1.55%

CATERPILLAR INC 0.49% 1.12%

INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CO 0.35% 1.70%

LINDE PLC 0.35% 1.40%

PEPSICO 0.27% 1.38%

ABBOTT LABORATORIES 0.27% 1.44%

Only in one fund ↓

Only in IVV

NVIDIA 7.92%

APPLE 7.61%

MICROSOFT 5.93%

AMAZON.COM INC 3.73%

ALPHABET CLASS A 2.83%

BROADCOM INC 2.45%

ALPHABET CLASS C 2.26%

META PLATFORMS CLASS A 2.05%

Only in NOBL

Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

IVV iShares Core S&P 500 ETF NOBL ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF

Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF

Issuer iShares ProShares

What it is Tracks the S&P 500 Tracks the S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats

Total return, 1 year +13.7% +15.5%

Its benchmark over the same days +13.6% (SPY) not measured

Gap to its benchmark +0.1 pts vs SPY not measured

Expense ratio 0.03% 0.35%

Already in the S&P 500 99.8% 98.3%

Holdings 505 69

Net assets, IVV as of Oct 27, 2026 and NOBL as of Oct 28, 2026 $885.1bn $11.6bn

IVV and NOBL on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-097EEE5BA1

IVV and NOBL do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?

What each follows. IVV follows S&P 500 and NOBL follows S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Index.
Holdings in common. 11% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Oct 27, 2026).
Number of holdings. IVV holds 505 positions and NOBL holds 69.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

About each fund

IVV

IVV tracks the S&P 500. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +13.7% with distributions reinvested, against +13.6% for its benchmark, the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 505 positions, with the top ten at 38.1%.

NOBL

NOBL tracks the S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +15.5% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.35% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 98% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 69 positions, with the top ten at 17.0%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IVV or NOBL?: In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IVV returned +13.7% and NOBL +15.5%.
Which is cheaper, IVV or NOBL?: IVV is cheaper, by 0.32 percentage points a year. That is about $32 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do IVV and NOBL overlap with the S&P 500?: By their latest filed holdings, 100% of IVV and 98% of NOBL by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.

Other comparisons

IVV vs RSP IVV vs SDY IVV vs VOE COWZ vs IVV NOBL vs SPY NOBL vs VOO NOBL vs VTI NOBL vs RDVY

Where to next

IVV on its own →NOBL on its own →Hold both: look the portfolio through →Rankings →IVV dividend history →IVV holdings →NOBL dividend history →NOBL holdings →Standards and sources →

Sources and dates

IVV filings on SEC EDGAR ↗

IVV prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗

iShares page for IVV ↗

NOBL filings on SEC EDGAR ↗

NOBL prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗

ProShares page for NOBL ↗

Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, IVV against NOBL, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ivv-vs-nobl

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.