Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

IUS vs PRF: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, IUS returned +25.9% to PRF's +24.1%; 75% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about IUS and PRF

Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $1.0bn for Invesco RAFI Strategic US ETF and $10.1bn for Invesco RAFI US 1000 ETF.

At a glance
+25.9%
IUS total return, 1 year
+24.1%
PRF total return, 1 year
0.19%
IUS expense ratio
0.34%
PRF expense ratio

Pair scorecard

IUS costs 0.15 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 1.8 points; PRF is 10.1 times larger.

IUS vs PRF: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureIUSPRF
Return
Total return, 1 year+25.9%+24.1%
Benchmark
What it tracksInvesco Strategic US IndexRAFI Fundamental Select US 1000 Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.19%0.34%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$1.0bn$10.1bn
Holdings
Holdings in common75%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund27.2%23.3%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Sep 21, 2018 to Oct 23, 2026 · 422 weekly returns · each against IWV
IUS PRF
Return
Total return edge IUS +219.5% +172.7%
Annualized edge IUS +15.4% +13.2%
Price return edge IUS +177.1% +132.0%
Risk
Volatility edge IUS (slight) 17.4% 18.5%
Max drawdown edge IUS (slight) −32.8% −35.6%
Downside capture 85.5% 90.8%
Beta 0.86 0.93
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge IUS 0.75 0.61
Sortino edge IUS 1.07 0.86
Treynor 0.152 0.121
Calmar edge IUS 0.47 0.37
Against the benchmark
Alpha +3.2% a year +0.6% a year
Alpha t-stat 1.33 0.25
Information ratio 0.21 −0.04
Tracking error 7.3% 6.4%
Reading

IUS returned more: +219.5% to +172.7%. IUS swung slightly less: 17.4% to 18.5%. IUS fell slightly less at its worst: −32.8% to −35.6%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: IUS vs PRF: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureIUSPRFIWVEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+219.5%+172.7%IUSPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+15.4%+13.2%IUSTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+177.1%+132.0%IUSPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility17.4%18.5%IUS (slight)Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation12.2%13.2%IUS (slight)Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−32.8%−35.6%IUS (slight)Deepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture79.9%82.9%100.0%PRF (slight)Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture85.5%90.8%100.0%IUS (slight)Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta0.860.931.00IUS lowerHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared0.850.891.00Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.750.61IUSReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino1.070.86IUSReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.1520.1210.115IUSReturn above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.470.37IUSAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkIWVIWVIWVThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha+3.2% a year+0.6% a year0.0%Not significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat1.330.25Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−1.5% to +7.9%−3.8% to +4.9%Both include zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio0.21−0.04IUSReturn against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error7.3%6.4%0.0%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 422 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

75%

By the books each fund has filed, IUS and PRF hold 75% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

75% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first IUS PRF
Apple Inc 4.34% 4.75%
Microsoft Corp 4.15% 3.19%
Alphabet Inc 3.24% 3.07%
Amazon.com Inc 2.60% 2.28%
ExxonMobil Holdings Corp 2.48% 2.05%
Berkshire Hathaway Inc 2.78% 1.89%
Meta Platforms Inc 2.55% 1.75%
Chevron Corp 1.63% 1.45%
UnitedHealth Group Inc 1.36% 1.23%
Johnson & Johnson 0.96% 1.10%
Walmart Inc 0.91% 0.82%
Procter & Gamble Co 0.77% 0.79%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in IUS
MercadoLibre Inc 0.16%
Ternium SA 0.10%
Waste Connections Inc 0.08%
NU Holdings Ltd 0.07%
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd 0.07%
Garmin Ltd 0.06%
Lululemon Athletica Inc 0.05%
Autoliv Inc 0.04%
Only in PRF
JPMorgan Chase & Co 1.61%
Bank of America Corp 0.98%
Wells Fargo & Co 0.79%
Citigroup Inc 0.77%
Moderna Inc 0.56%
Goldman Sachs Group Inc 0.49%
Morgan Stanley 0.37%
Capital One Financial Corp 0.33%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

IUS Invesco RAFI Strategic US ETF PRF Invesco RAFI US 1000 ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index Tracks an index
Total return, 1 year +25.9% +24.1%
Its benchmark over the same days +13.3% (IWV) +13.3% (IWV)
Gap to its benchmark +12.6 pts vs IWV +10.8 pts vs IWV
Expense ratio 0.19% 0.34%
Already in the S&P 500 91.8% 86.6%
Holdings 536 998
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 $1.0bn $10.1bn

IUS and PRF on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-577F663572

IUS and PRF are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?

  1. What each follows. IUS follows Invesco Strategic US Index and PRF follows RAFI Fundamental Select US 1000 Index.
  2. Cost. IUS charges 0.19% of assets a year and PRF 0.34%, a gap of 0.15 points.
  3. Size. IUS has $1.0bn in net assets and PRF $10.1bn (net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026); PRF is 10.1 times larger.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

IUS and PRF flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
IUS

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +25.9% with distributions reinvested, against +13.3% for its benchmark, the Russell 3000 Index.

IUS tracks an index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.19% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 536 positions, with the top ten at 27.2%.

PRF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +24.1% with distributions reinvested, against +13.3% for its benchmark, the Russell 3000 Index.

PRF tracks an index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.34% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 87% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 998 positions, with the top ten at 23.3%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IUS or PRF?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IUS returned +25.9% and PRF +24.1%.
Which is cheaper, IUS or PRF?
IUS is cheaper, by 0.15 percentage points a year. That is about $15 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do IUS and PRF overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 92% of IUS and 87% of PRF by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, IUS against PRF, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ius-vs-prf

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.