ITOT vs KLMN: Differences, Returns & Fees
ITOT and KLMN hold 79% of their weight in the same names. Net assets on Oct 9, 2026: $98.1bn for iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF and $2.5bn for Invesco MSCI North America Climate ETF.
ITOT costs 0.06 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 0.4 points; ITOT is far larger, $98.1bn against $2.5bn.
| ITOT | KLMN | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.03% | 0.09% |
| Net assets | $98.1bn | $2.5bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +16.8% | +17.2% |
| What it tracks | S&P Total U.S. Stock Market | MSCI Global Climate 500 North America Selection Index |
| Holdings in common | 79% | |
| Holdings dated | Oct 8, 2026 | Oct 10, 2026 |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 34.8% | 36.5% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 8, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, ITOT and KLMN hold 79% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Oct 8, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.
half
79% in common
On the same fields
ITOT and KLMN on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
ITOT in plain words
ITOT tracks the S&P Total U.S. Stock Market. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +16.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 8, 2026, 88% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2,458 positions, with the top ten at 34.8%.
KLMN in plain words
KLMN tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +17.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 10, 2026, 94% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 274 positions, with the top ten at 36.5%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, ITOT or KLMN?
- In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, ITOT returned +16.8% and KLMN +17.2%.
- Which is cheaper, ITOT or KLMN?
- ITOT is cheaper, by 0.06 percentage points a year. That is about $6 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, ITOT against KLMN, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/itot-vs-klmn
ETFIQ. (Oct 9, 2026). ITOT against KLMN. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/itot-vs-klmn
[ITOT against KLMN (ETFIQ, Oct 9, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/itot-vs-klmn)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.