ILCV vs REGL: how they differ

ILCV and REGL hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and ILCV returned +22.0% over the year. iShares Morningstar Value ETF and ProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats ETF.

ILCV costs 0.36 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 16.0 points; REGL is 1.2 times larger.

ILCVREGL
Expense ratio0.04%0.40%
Net assets$1.4bn$1.7bn
Total return, 1 year+22.0%+6.0%
Holdings in common0%
Nasdaq-100, total return, 1 year+23.6%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund35.8%17.5%
Below its high8.5%, high on Aug 14, 2026

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 8, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.

+22.0%
ILCV total return, 1 year
+6.0%
REGL total return, 1 year
0.04%
ILCV expense ratio
0.40%
REGL expense ratio

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, ILCV and REGL hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Oct 8, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.

half

0% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding ILCV REGL
RELIANCE STEEL & ALUMINUM 0.03% 1.71%
Only in ILCV
MICROSOFT 8.53%
APPLE 7.23%
AMAZON.COM INC 3.29%
META PLATFORMS CLASS A 2.95%
BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC CLASS B 2.75%
JPMORGAN CHASE & CO 2.57%
ALPHABET CLASS A 2.56%
ALPHABET CLASS C 2.06%
Only in REGL
ROYAL GOLD INC 1.93%
REINSURANCE GROUP OF AMERICA 1.79%
GRACO INC 1.74%
SEI INVESTMENTS COMPANY 1.74%
MSA SAFETY INC 1.73%
LINCOLN ELECTRIC HOLDINGS 1.72%
UNUM GROUP 1.71%
RENAISSANCERE HOLDINGS LTD 1.70%

Check overlap with more funds →

On the same fields

ILCV
iShares Morningstar Value ETF
REGL
ProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index Tracks an index
Total return, 1 year +22.0% +6.0%
S&P 500 over the same days +17.3% +17.3%
Gap to the S&P 500 +4.8 pts −11.2 pts
Expense ratio 0.04% 0.40%
Already in the S&P 500 96.0% 0.0%
Holdings 374 65
Net assets $1.4bn $1.7bn

ILCV and REGL on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

ILCV in plain words

ILCV tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +22.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500 and +23.6% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 8, 2026, 96% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 374 positions, with the top ten at 35.8%.

REGL in plain words

REGL tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +6.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500 and +23.6% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.40% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 9, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 65 positions, with the top ten at 17.5%. It sat 8.5% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, ILCV or REGL?
In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, ILCV returned +22.0% and REGL +6.0%.
Which is cheaper, ILCV or REGL?
ILCV is cheaper, by 0.36 percentage points a year. On $10,000 held for a year that difference is about $36. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do ILCV and REGL overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 96% of ILCV and 0% of REGL by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed.

Cite this page

ETFIQ, ILCV against REGL, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ilcv-vs-regl

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.