REGL vs RSPA: how they differ
REGL and RSPA hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and RSPA returned +12.6% over the year. ProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats ETF and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Income Advantage ETF.
RSPA costs 0.11 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 6.6 points; REGL is 1.4 times larger.
| REGL | RSPA | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.40% | 0.29% |
| Net assets | $1.7bn | $1.2bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +6.0% | +12.6% |
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
| Nasdaq-100, total return, 1 year | +23.6% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 17.5% | 4.2% |
| Below its high | 8.5%, high on Aug 14, 2026 | 3.2%, high on Aug 26, 2026 |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 8, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, REGL and RSPA hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Oct 8, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.
half
0% in common
On the same fields
REGL and RSPA on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
REGL in plain words
REGL tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +6.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500 and +23.6% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.40% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 9, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 65 positions, with the top ten at 17.5%. It sat 8.5% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.
RSPA in plain words
RSPA is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +12.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500 and +23.6% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.29% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 8, 2026, 74% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 520 positions, with the top ten at 4.2%. It sat 3.2% below its high of Aug 26, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, REGL or RSPA?
- In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, REGL returned +6.0% and RSPA +12.6%.
- Which is cheaper, REGL or RSPA?
- RSPA is cheaper, by 0.11 percentage points a year. On $10,000 held for a year that difference is about $11. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed.
ETFIQ, REGL against RSPA, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/regl-vs-rspa
ETFIQ. (Oct 9, 2026). REGL against RSPA. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/regl-vs-rspa
[REGL against RSPA (ETFIQ, Oct 9, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/regl-vs-rspa)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.