REGL vs RWK: how they differ

REGL and RWK hold 13% of their weight in the same names, and RWK returned +15.9% over the year. ProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats ETF and Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Revenue ETF.

RWK costs 0.01 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 9.9 points; REGL is 1.3 times larger.

REGLRWK
Expense ratio0.40%0.39%
Net assets$1.7bn$1.3bn
Total return, 1 year+6.0%+15.9%
Holdings in common13%
Nasdaq-100, total return, 1 year+23.6%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund17.5%20.9%
Below its high8.5%, high on Aug 14, 20266.7%, high on Aug 14, 2026

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 8, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.

+6.0%
REGL total return, 1 year
+15.9%
RWK total return, 1 year
0.40%
REGL expense ratio
0.39%
RWK expense ratio

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, REGL and RWK hold 13% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Oct 8, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.

half

13% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding REGL RWK
LITHIA MOTORS INC 1.40% 1.22%
REINSURANCE GROUP OF AMERICA 1.79% 1.11%
RELIANCE INC 1.71% 0.65%
UNUM GROUP 1.71% 0.54%
RYDER SYSTEM INC 1.42% 0.50%
RENAISSANCERE HOLDINGS LTD 1.70% 0.47%
WESTLAKE CORP 1.33% 0.40%
OLD REPUBLIC INTL CORP 1.51% 0.38%
THOR INDUSTRIES INC 1.35% 0.37%
AMERICAN FINANCIAL GROUP INC 1.65% 0.34%
RPM INTERNATIONAL INC 1.49% 0.32%
SONOCO PRODUCTS CO 1.43% 0.30%
Only in REGL
Only in RWK
Albertsons Cos Inc 3.54%
TD SYNNEX Corp 2.96%
Performance Food Group Co 2.75%
American Airlines Group Inc 2.36%
Molina Healthcare Inc 1.84%
PBF Energy Inc 1.64%
US Foods Holding Corp 1.64%
Arrow Electronics Inc 1.55%

Check overlap with more funds →

On the same fields

REGL
ProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats ETF
RWK
Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Revenue ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index Tracks an index
Total return, 1 year +6.0% +15.9%
S&P 500 over the same days +17.3% +17.3%
Gap to the S&P 500 −11.2 pts −1.3 pts
Expense ratio 0.40% 0.39%
Already in the S&P 500 0.0% 2.4%
Holdings 65 400
Net assets $1.7bn $1.3bn

REGL and RWK on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

REGL in plain words

REGL tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +6.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500 and +23.6% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.40% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 9, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 65 positions, with the top ten at 17.5%. It sat 8.5% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.

RWK in plain words

RWK tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +15.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500 and +23.6% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.39% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 8, 2026, 2% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 400 positions, with the top ten at 20.9%. It sat 6.7% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, REGL or RWK?
In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, REGL returned +6.0% and RWK +15.9%.
Which is cheaper, REGL or RWK?
RWK is cheaper, by 0.01 percentage points a year. On $10,000 held for a year that difference is about $1. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do REGL and RWK overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of REGL and 2% of RWK by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed.

Cite this page

ETFIQ, REGL against RWK, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/regl-vs-rwk

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.