RWK vs VOE: how they differ

RWK and VOE hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and VOE returned +19.3% over the year. Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Revenue ETF and Vanguard Morningstar Mid-Cap Value ETF.

VOE costs 0.34 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 3.4 points; VOE is 17.8 times larger.

RWKVOE
Expense ratio0.39%0.05%
Net assets, RWK as of Oct 9, 2026 and VOE as of Sep 30, 2026$1.3bn$22.8bn
Total return, 1 year+15.9%+19.3%
Holdings in common0%
Nasdaq-100, total return, 1 year+23.6%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund20.9%13.9%
Below its high6.7%, high on Aug 14, 20263.7%, high on Aug 14, 2026

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 8, 2026.

+15.9%
RWK total return, 1 year
+19.3%
VOE total return, 1 year
0.39%
RWK expense ratio
0.05%
VOE expense ratio

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, RWK and VOE hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 8, 2026.

half

0% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding RWK VOE
Only in RWK
Albertsons Cos Inc 3.54%
TD SYNNEX Corp 2.96%
Performance Food Group Co 2.75%
American Airlines Group Inc 2.36%
Molina Healthcare Inc 1.84%
PBF Energy Inc 1.64%
US Foods Holding Corp 1.64%
Arrow Electronics Inc 1.55%
Only in VOE
Marathon Petroleum Corp 1.80%
Valero Energy Corp 1.76%
Phillips 66 1.64%
SLB Ltd 1.49%
Cummins Inc 1.29%
General Motors Co 1.29%
Target Corp 1.21%
Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co 1.15%

Check overlap with more funds →

On the same fields

RWK
Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Revenue ETF
VOE
Vanguard Morningstar Mid-Cap Value ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index Tracks an index of Mid-Cap Value
Total return, 1 year +15.9% +19.3%
S&P 500 over the same days +17.3% +17.3%
Gap to the S&P 500 −1.3 pts +2.1 pts
Expense ratio 0.39% 0.05%
Already in the S&P 500 2.4% 96.0%
Holdings 400 170
Net assets, RWK as of Oct 9, 2026 and VOE as of Sep 30, 2026 $1.3bn $22.8bn

RWK and VOE on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

RWK in plain words

RWK tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +15.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500 and +23.6% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.39% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 8, 2026, 2% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 400 positions, with the top ten at 20.9%. It sat 6.7% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.

VOE in plain words

VOE tracks an index of Mid-Cap Value. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +19.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500 and +23.6% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.05% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer as of Aug 31, 2026, 96% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 170 positions, with the top ten at 13.9%. It sat 3.7% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, RWK or VOE?
In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, RWK returned +15.9% and VOE +19.3%.
Which is cheaper, RWK or VOE?
VOE is cheaper, by 0.34 percentage points a year. On $10,000 held for a year that difference is about $34. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do RWK and VOE overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 2% of RWK and 96% of VOE by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed.

Cite this page

ETFIQ, RWK against VOE, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/rwk-vs-voe

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.