ILCV vs PKW: how they differ

ILCV and PKW hold 7% of their weight in the same names, and ILCV returned +22.0% over the year. iShares Morningstar Value ETF and Invesco BuyBack Achievers ETF.

ILCV costs 0.59 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 9.5 points; PKW is 1.3 times larger.

ILCVPKW
Expense ratio0.04%0.63%
Net assets$1.4bn$1.7bn
Total return, 1 year+22.0%+12.5%
Holdings in common7%
Nasdaq-100, total return, 1 year+23.6%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund35.8%41.3%
Below its high4.5%, high on Sep 3, 2026

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 8, 2026.

+22.0%
ILCV total return, 1 year
+12.5%
PKW total return, 1 year
0.04%
ILCV expense ratio
0.63%
PKW expense ratio

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, ILCV and PKW hold 7% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Oct 8, 2026.

half

7% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding ILCV PKW
BANK OF AMERICA 1.01% 4.39%
WELLS FARGO 0.72% 4.63%
CITIGROUP 0.63% 4.26%
SALESFORCE 0.53% 5.98%
VALERO ENERGY CORP 0.37% 4.07%
CHARLES SCHWAB 0.30% 4.89%
ADOBE INC 0.28% 3.10%
TRAVELERS COMPANIES 0.23% 2.55%
GENERAL MOTORS 0.21% 2.43%
MARATHON PETROLEUM 0.20% 4.18%
HCA HEALTHCARE 0.19% 2.54%
CHENIERE ENERGY 0.17% 2.06%
Only in ILCV
MICROSOFT 8.53%
APPLE 7.23%
AMAZON.COM INC 3.29%
META PLATFORMS CLASS A 2.95%
BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC CLASS B 2.75%
JPMORGAN CHASE & CO 2.57%
ALPHABET CLASS A 2.56%
ALPHABET CLASS C 2.06%
Only in PKW
Johnson Controls International plc 3.26%
MSCI Inc 1.25%
AerCap Holdings NV 0.86%
ON Semiconductor Corp 0.76%
Zebra Technologies Corp 0.56%
Yum China Holdings Inc 0.50%
Exelixis Inc 0.50%
Carlisle Cos Inc 0.44%

Check overlap with more funds →

On the same fields

ILCV
iShares Morningstar Value ETF
PKW
Invesco BuyBack Achievers ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index Tracks an index
Total return, 1 year +22.0% +12.5%
S&P 500 over the same days +17.3% +17.3%
Gap to the S&P 500 +4.8 pts −4.8 pts
Expense ratio 0.04% 0.63%
Already in the S&P 500 96.0% 68.8%
Holdings 374 288
Net assets $1.4bn $1.7bn

ILCV and PKW on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

ILCV in plain words

ILCV tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +22.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500 and +23.6% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 8, 2026, 96% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 374 positions, with the top ten at 35.8%.

PKW in plain words

PKW tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +12.5% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500 and +23.6% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.63% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 8, 2026, 69% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 288 positions, with the top ten at 41.3%. It sat 4.5% below its high of Sep 3, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, ILCV or PKW?
In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, ILCV returned +22.0% and PKW +12.5%.
Which is cheaper, ILCV or PKW?
ILCV is cheaper, by 0.59 percentage points a year. On $10,000 held for a year that difference is about $59. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do ILCV and PKW overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 96% of ILCV and 69% of PKW by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed.

Cite this page

ETFIQ, ILCV against PKW, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ilcv-vs-pkw

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.