A
vs
B
Share on XDownload as PDFCompare their flowsAsk about these two funds

IJJ vs MDYV: how they differ

IJJ and MDYV hold 100% of their weight in the same names. iShares S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF and State Street SPDR S & P 400 Mid Cap Value ETF.

MDYV costs 0.03 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 0.1 points; IJJ is 3.1 times larger.

IJJMDYV
Expense ratio0.18%0.15%
Net assets, IJJ as of Oct 9, 2026 and MDYV as of Oct 8, 2026$8.4bn$2.7bn
Total return, 1 year+10.5%+10.4%
Holdings in common100%
Nasdaq-100, total return, 1 year+23.6%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund11.0%11.0%
Below its high7.1%, high on Aug 14, 2026

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 8, 2026.

+10.5%
IJJ total return, 1 year
+10.4%
MDYV total return, 1 year
0.18%
IJJ expense ratio
0.15%
MDYV expense ratio

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, IJJ and MDYV hold 100% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Oct 8, 2026.

half

100% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding IJJ MDYV
TD SYNNEX 1.30% 1.30%
US FOODS HOLDING 1.27% 1.27%
RELIANCE STEEL & ALUMINUM 1.23% 1.23%
PERMIAN RESOURCES CLASS A 1.16% 1.16%
HF SINCLAIR 1.13% 1.13%
OVINTIV 1.06% 1.06%
WESCO INTERNATIONAL 1.05% 1.05%
REINSURANCE GROUP OF AMERICA 1.01% 1.01%
SHARKNINJA 0.93% 0.93%
PERFORMANCE FOOD GROUP 0.91% 0.90%
ENTEGRIS INC 0.90% 0.90%
ARAMARK 0.89% 0.89%
Only in IJJ
CASH COLLATERAL USD BOASW CFD 0.00%
BANK OZK 0.00%
FIDELITY NATIONAL FINANCIAL INC 0.00%
HARLEY DAVIDSON 0.00%
S&P MID 400 EMINI DEC 26 0.00%
UNITED BANKSHARES 0.00%
ZIONS BANCORPORATION 0.00%
Only in MDYV

Check overlap with more funds →

On the same fields

IJJ
iShares S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF
MDYV
State Street SPDR S & P 400 Mid Cap Value ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
Issuer iShares State Street
What it is Tracks an index Tracks an index
Total return, 1 year +10.5% +10.4%
S&P 500 over the same days +17.3% +17.3%
Gap to the S&P 500 −6.7 pts −6.9 pts
Expense ratio 0.18% 0.15%
Already in the S&P 500 0.0% 0.0%
Holdings 303 296
Net assets, IJJ as of Oct 9, 2026 and MDYV as of Oct 8, 2026 $8.4bn $2.7bn

IJJ and MDYV on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

IJJ in plain words

IJJ tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +10.5% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500 and +23.6% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 8, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 303 positions, with the top ten at 11.0%. It sat 7.1% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.

MDYV in plain words

MDYV tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +10.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500 and +23.6% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 8, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 296 positions, with the top ten at 11.0%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IJJ or MDYV?
In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IJJ returned +10.5% and MDYV +10.4%.
Which is cheaper, IJJ or MDYV?
MDYV is cheaper, by 0.03 percentage points a year. On $10,000 held for a year that difference is about $3. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do IJJ and MDYV overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of IJJ and 0% of MDYV by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
IJJ vs WTVIJJ vs IWSIJJ vs PKWIJJ vs REGLMDYV vs SDYMDYV vs VOEMDYV vs WTVMDYV vs PKW
IJJ on its own →MDYV on its own →Hold both: look the portfolio through →Rankings →Standards and sources →
Where these figures came from
IJJ filings on SEC EDGAR ↗IJJ prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗iShares page for IJJ ↗MDYV filings on SEC EDGAR ↗MDYV prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗State Street website ↗

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed.

Cite this page

ETFIQ, IJJ against MDYV, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ijj-vs-mdyv

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.