IJJ vs REGL: how they differ

IJJ and REGL hold 21% of their weight in the same names, and IJJ returned +10.5% over the year. iShares S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF and ProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats ETF.

IJJ costs 0.22 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 4.5 points; IJJ is 5.1 times larger.

IJJREGL
Expense ratio0.18%0.40%
Net assets$8.4bn$1.7bn
Total return, 1 year+10.5%+6.0%
Holdings in common21%
Nasdaq-100, total return, 1 year+23.6%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund11.0%17.5%
Below its high7.1%, high on Aug 14, 20268.5%, high on Aug 14, 2026

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 8, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.

+10.5%
IJJ total return, 1 year
+6.0%
REGL total return, 1 year
0.18%
IJJ expense ratio
0.40%
REGL expense ratio

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, IJJ and REGL hold 21% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Oct 8, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.

half

21% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding IJJ REGL
RELIANCE STEEL & ALUMINUM 1.23% 1.71%
REINSURANCE GROUP OF AMERICA 1.01% 1.79%
UNUM 0.81% 1.71%
ESSENTIAL UTILITIES INC 0.67% 1.62%
OGE ENERGY 0.58% 1.55%
UMB FINANCIAL 0.57% 1.52%
TORO 0.56% 1.66%
RYDER SYSTEM 0.55% 1.42%
PROSPERITY BANCSHARES 0.49% 1.49%
APTARGROUP 0.47% 1.53%
RPM INTERNATIONAL INC 0.45% 1.49%
COMMERCE BANCSHARES 0.45% 1.52%
Only in IJJ
TD SYNNEX 1.30%
US FOODS HOLDING 1.27%
PERMIAN RESOURCES CLASS A 1.16%
HF SINCLAIR 1.13%
OVINTIV 1.06%
WESCO INTERNATIONAL 1.05%
SHARKNINJA 0.93%
PERFORMANCE FOOD GROUP 0.91%
Only in REGL
ROYAL GOLD INC 1.93%
ENSIGN GROUP INC/THE 1.67%
CHURCHILL DOWNS INC 1.60%
RB GLOBAL INC 1.28%

Check overlap with more funds →

On the same fields

IJJ
iShares S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF
REGL
ProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index Tracks an index
Total return, 1 year +10.5% +6.0%
S&P 500 over the same days +17.3% +17.3%
Gap to the S&P 500 −6.7 pts −11.2 pts
Expense ratio 0.18% 0.40%
Already in the S&P 500 0.0% 0.0%
Holdings 303 65
Net assets $8.4bn $1.7bn

IJJ and REGL on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

IJJ in plain words

IJJ tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +10.5% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500 and +23.6% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 8, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 303 positions, with the top ten at 11.0%. It sat 7.1% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.

REGL in plain words

REGL tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +6.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500 and +23.6% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.40% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 9, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 65 positions, with the top ten at 17.5%. It sat 8.5% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IJJ or REGL?
In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IJJ returned +10.5% and REGL +6.0%.
Which is cheaper, IJJ or REGL?
IJJ is cheaper, by 0.22 percentage points a year. On $10,000 held for a year that difference is about $22. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do IJJ and REGL overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of IJJ and 0% of REGL by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed.

Cite this page

ETFIQ, IJJ against REGL, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ijj-vs-regl

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.