REGL vs VOE: how they differ

REGL and VOE hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and VOE returned +19.3% over the year. ProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats ETF and Vanguard Morningstar Mid-Cap Value ETF.

VOE costs 0.35 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 13.3 points; VOE is 13.8 times larger.

REGLVOE
Expense ratio0.40%0.05%
Net assets, REGL as of Oct 9, 2026 and VOE as of Sep 30, 2026$1.7bn$22.8bn
Total return, 1 year+6.0%+19.3%
Holdings in common0%
Nasdaq-100, total return, 1 year+23.6%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund17.5%13.9%
Below its high8.5%, high on Aug 14, 20263.7%, high on Aug 14, 2026

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.

+6.0%
REGL total return, 1 year
+19.3%
VOE total return, 1 year
0.40%
REGL expense ratio
0.05%
VOE expense ratio

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, REGL and VOE hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.

half

0% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding REGL VOE
Only in REGL
ROYAL GOLD INC 1.93%
REINSURANCE GROUP OF AMERICA 1.79%
GRACO INC 1.74%
SEI INVESTMENTS COMPANY 1.74%
MSA SAFETY INC 1.73%
LINCOLN ELECTRIC HOLDINGS 1.72%
RELIANCE INC 1.71%
UNUM GROUP 1.71%
Only in VOE
Marathon Petroleum Corp 1.80%
Valero Energy Corp 1.76%
Phillips 66 1.64%
SLB Ltd 1.49%
Cummins Inc 1.29%
General Motors Co 1.29%
Target Corp 1.21%
Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co 1.15%

Check overlap with more funds →

On the same fields

REGL
ProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats ETF
VOE
Vanguard Morningstar Mid-Cap Value ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index Tracks an index of Mid-Cap Value
Total return, 1 year +6.0% +19.3%
S&P 500 over the same days +17.3% +17.3%
Gap to the S&P 500 −11.2 pts +2.1 pts
Expense ratio 0.40% 0.05%
Already in the S&P 500 0.0% 96.0%
Holdings 65 170
Net assets, REGL as of Oct 9, 2026 and VOE as of Sep 30, 2026 $1.7bn $22.8bn

REGL and VOE on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

REGL in plain words

REGL tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +6.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500 and +23.6% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.40% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 9, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 65 positions, with the top ten at 17.5%. It sat 8.5% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.

VOE in plain words

VOE tracks an index of Mid-Cap Value. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +19.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500 and +23.6% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.05% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer as of Aug 31, 2026, 96% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 170 positions, with the top ten at 13.9%. It sat 3.7% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, REGL or VOE?
In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, REGL returned +6.0% and VOE +19.3%.
Which is cheaper, REGL or VOE?
VOE is cheaper, by 0.35 percentage points a year. On $10,000 held for a year that difference is about $35. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do REGL and VOE overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of REGL and 96% of VOE by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed.

Cite this page

ETFIQ, REGL against VOE, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/regl-vs-voe

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.