IEFA vs IQLT: Differences, Returns & Fees

IEFA and IQLT hold 39% of their weight in the same names, and IQLT returned +14.8% over the year. Net assets on Oct 9, 2026: $189.5bn for iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF and $13.6bn for iShares MSCI Intl Quality Factor ETF.

IEFA costs 0.23 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 0.9 points; IEFA is 13.9 times larger.

IEFAIQLT
Expense ratio0.07%0.30%
Net assets$189.5bn$13.6bn
Total return, 1 year+13.9%+14.8%
What it tracksMSCI EAFE IMI Indexnot read by ETFIQ
Holdings in common39%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund12.2%23.7%
Below its high4.8%, high on Aug 25, 2026

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 8, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.

+13.9%
IEFA total return, 1 year
+14.8%
IQLT total return, 1 year
0.07%
IEFA expense ratio
0.30%
IQLT expense ratio

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, IEFA and IQLT hold 39% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Oct 8, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.

half

39% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding IEFA IQLT
ASML HOLDING 2.87% 6.01%
ROCHE PS PAR AG 1.20% 2.20%
SHELL 1.17% 1.85%
NOVARTIS AG 1.05% 1.67%
ASTRAZENECA PLC 0.96% 1.59%
NESTLE SA 0.95% 1.69%
BHP GROUP LTD 0.88% 1.54%
ADVANTEST 0.77% 2.24%
ALLIANZ 0.71% 2.57%
TOKYO ELECTRON 0.69% 1.40%
TOTALENERGIES 0.68% 1.34%
SCHNEIDER ELECTRIC 0.65% 1.30%
Only in IEFA
HSBC HOLDINGS PLC 1.26%
MITSUBISHI UFJ FINANCIAL GROUP 0.95%
SIEMENS N AG 0.87%
SAP 0.85%
BANCO SANTANDER 0.77%
COMMONWEALTH BANK OF AUSTRALIA 0.70%
TOYOTA MOTOR 0.70%
HITACHI 0.63%
Only in IQLT
CANADIAN NATURAL RESOURCES LTD 1.01%
MANULIFE FINANCIAL 0.83%
SUNCOR ENERGY INC 0.66%
AGNICO EAGLE MINES 0.58%
CELESTICA 0.52%
SUN LIFE FINANCIAL INC 0.51%
CANADIAN NATIONAL RAILWAY 0.50%
INTACT FINANCIAL CORP 0.45%

Check overlap with more funds →

On the same fields

IEFA
iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF
IQLT
iShares MSCI Intl Quality Factor ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks the MSCI EAFE Tracks an index
Total return, 1 year +13.9% +14.8%
S&P 500 over the same days +17.3% +17.3%
Gap to the S&P 500 −3.3 pts −2.5 pts
Expense ratio 0.07% 0.30%
Already in the S&P 500 0.0% 0.0%
Holdings 2628 294
Net assets $189.5bn $13.6bn

IEFA and IQLT on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

IEFA in plain words

IEFA tracks the MSCI EAFE. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +13.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.07% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 8, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2,628 positions, with the top ten at 12.2%. It sat 4.8% below its high of Aug 25, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.

IQLT in plain words

IQLT tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +14.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.30% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 9, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 294 positions, with the top ten at 23.7%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IEFA or IQLT?
In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IEFA returned +13.9% and IQLT +14.8%.
Which is cheaper, IEFA or IQLT?
IEFA is cheaper, by 0.23 percentage points a year. That is about $23 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do IEFA and IQLT overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of IEFA and 0% of IQLT by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, IEFA against IQLT, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iefa-vs-iqlt

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.