Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

IEFA vs SCHF: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, IEFA returned +12.3% to SCHF's +17.6%; 60% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about IEFA and SCHF

Net assets: $190.4bn on Oct 28, 2026 for iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF, and $69.7bn on Aug 31, 2026 for Schwab International Equity ETF.

At a glance
+12.3%
IEFA total return, 1 year
+17.6%
SCHF total return, 1 year
0.07%
IEFA expense ratio
0.03%
SCHF expense ratio

Pair scorecard

SCHF costs 0.04 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 5.3 points.

IEFA vs SCHF: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureIEFASCHF
Return
Total return, 1 year+12.3%+17.6%
Drawdown
Below its high4.7%, high on Aug 25, 20264.4%, high on Aug 25, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksMSCI EAFE IMI IndexFTSE Developed ex US Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.07%0.03%
Net assets, IEFA as of Oct 28, 2026 and SCHF as of Aug 31, 2026$190.4bn$69.7bn
Holdings
Holdings in common60%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund12.3%13.8%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Nov 2, 2012 to Oct 23, 2026 · 729 weekly returns
IEFA SCHF
Return
Total return edge SCHF (slight) +199.1% +204.1%
Annualized edge Tie +8.1% +8.3%
Price return edge SCHF (slight) +100.2% +105.4%
Risk
Volatility edge Tie 16.2% 16.0%
Max drawdown edge Tie −34.1% −33.8%
Downside capture 97.7% 99.0%
Beta 1.00 0.99
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge SCHF (slight) 0.45 0.46
Sortino edge SCHF (slight) 0.64 0.65
Treynor 0.073 0.069
Calmar edge SCHF (slight) 0.24 0.24
Against the benchmark
Alpha +0.8% a year +0.5% a year
Alpha t-stat 0.96 1.02
Information ratio 0.25 0.20
Tracking error 3.2% 1.9%

Each against its own benchmark: IEFA against ACWX, Nov 2, 2012 to Oct 23, 2026; SCHF against EFA, Nov 13, 2009 to Oct 23, 2026.

Reading

SCHF returned slightly more: +204.1% to +199.1%. IEFA and SCHF swung about the same: 16.2% and 16.0%. IEFA and SCHF fell about the same at their worst: −34.1% and −33.8%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: IEFA vs SCHF: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureIEFASCHFEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+199.1%+204.1%SCHF (slight)Price change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+8.1%+8.3%TieTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+100.2%+105.4%SCHF (slight)Price change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility16.2%16.0%TieSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation11.5%11.3%TieLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−34.1%−33.8%TieDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture98.1%99.2%Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture97.7%99.0%Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta1.000.99Not an edgeHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared0.960.99Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.450.46SCHF (slight)Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino0.640.65SCHF (slight)Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.0730.069Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.240.24SCHF (slight)Annualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkACWXEFAThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha+0.8% a year+0.5% a yearNot significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat0.961.02Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−0.9% to +2.5%−0.4% to +1.4%Includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio0.250.20Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error3.2%1.9%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 729 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

60%

By the books each fund has filed, IEFA and SCHF hold 60% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

60% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first IEFA SCHF
ASML HOLDING 2.55% 2.14%
HSBC HOLDINGS PLC 1.18% 1.17%
NOVARTIS AG 1.14% 0.94%
SHELL 1.21% 0.83%
NESTLE SA 1.04% 0.83%
MITSUBISHI UFJ FINANCIAL GROUP 0.92% 0.82%
ASTRAZENECA PLC 1.04% 0.80%
BHP GROUP LTD 0.83% 0.79%
SAP 0.97% 0.75%
BANCO SANTANDER 0.72% 0.71%
TOYOTA MOTOR 0.75% 0.69%
ALLIANZ 0.74% 0.66%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in IEFA
ROCHE PS PAR AG 1.36%
SIEMENS N AG 0.86%
NOVO NORDISK CLASS B 0.50%
LAIR LIQUIDE SOCIETE ANONYME POUR 0.49%
LOREAL SA 0.46%
SIEMENS ENERGY N AG 0.45%
UNICREDIT 0.45%
COMPAGNIE FINANCIERE RICHEMONT SA 0.43%
Only in SCHF
Samsung Electronics Co Ltd 2.88%
SK hynix Inc 2.23%
Royal Bank of Canada 0.94%
Siemens AG 0.80%
Toronto-Dominion Bank 0.67%
Shopify Inc 0.59%
UniCredit SpA 0.49%
Novo Nordisk A/S 0.47%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

IEFA iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF SCHF Schwab International Equity ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks the MSCI EAFE Tracks an index of International Equity
Total return, 1 year +12.3% +17.6%
Its benchmark over the same days +14.3% (ACWX) +12.1% (EFA)
Gap to its benchmark −2.0 pts vs ACWX +5.5 pts vs EFA
Expense ratio 0.07% 0.03%
Already in the S&P 500 0.0% 0.0%
Holdings 2629 1475
Net assets, IEFA as of Oct 28, 2026 and SCHF as of Aug 31, 2026 $190.4bn $69.7bn

IEFA and SCHF on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-1B278B43FE

IEFA and SCHF are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?

  1. What each follows. IEFA follows MSCI EAFE IMI Index and SCHF follows FTSE Developed ex US Index.
  2. One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 IEFA returned +12.3% and SCHF +17.6% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 5.3 points.
  3. Holdings in common (similar). 60% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Oct 27, 2026 and Aug 31, 2026).

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

IEFA flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
IEFA

IEFA tracks the MSCI EAFE. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +12.3% with distributions reinvested, against +14.3% for its benchmark, the MSCI ACWI ex USA Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.07% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2,629 positions, with the top ten at 12.3%. It sat 4.7% below its high of Aug 25, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

SCHF

SCHF tracks an index of International Equity. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +17.6% with distributions reinvested, against +12.1% for its benchmark, the MSCI EAFE Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for Aug 31, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,475 positions, with the top ten at 13.8%. It sat 4.4% below its high of Aug 25, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IEFA or SCHF?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IEFA returned +12.3% and SCHF +17.6%.
Which is cheaper, IEFA or SCHF?
SCHF is cheaper, by 0.04 percentage points a year. That is about $4 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do IEFA and SCHF overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of IEFA and 0% of SCHF by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, IEFA against SCHF, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iefa-vs-schf

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.