Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

IEFA vs IXUS: how they differ

IEFA and IXUS hold 57% of their weight in the same names, and IXUS returned more over the year.

iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF and iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, IEFA and IXUS hold 57% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions IEFA and IXUS both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingIEFAIXUS
ASML HOLDING2.62%1.55%
HSBC HOLDINGS PLC1.40%0.84%
ROCHE PS PAR AG1.18%0.70%
SHELL PLC1.09%0.62%
MITSUBISHI UFJ FINANCIAL GROUP1.00%0.59%
NOVARTIS AG0.99%0.59%
NESTLE SA0.97%0.58%
ASTRAZENECA PLC0.94%0.56%
BHP GROUP LTD0.91%0.54%
SIEMENS N AG0.86%0.51%
ALLIANZ0.76%0.45%
COMMONWEALTH BANK OF AUSTRALIA0.72%0.43%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in IEFAOnly in IXUS
USD CASH 0.03%TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING 4.49%
4DMEDICAL 0.01%SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS LTD 2.21%
4IMPRINT GROUP PLC 0.01%SK HYNIX 1.79%
ADDLIFE CLASS B 0.01%TENCENT HOLDINGS 0.78%
AEM HOLDINGS LTD 0.01%ROYAL BANK OF CANADA 0.68%
AEON REIT INVESTMENT REIT CORP 0.01%ALIBABA GROUP HOLDING 0.53%
AICA KOGYO LTD 0.01%MEDIATEK 0.51%
AICHI FINANCIAL GROUP INC 0.01%TORONTO DOMINION 0.47%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 10, 2026.

IEFA and IXUS on the fields both publish, as of Sep 13, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
IEFA
iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF
IXUS
iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesiShares
What it isCore MSCI EAFECore MSCI Total International Stock
Total return, 1 year+18.0%+22.2%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+0.5 pts+4.7 pts
Expense ratio0.07%0.07%
Already in the S&P 5000.1%0.0%
Holdings16502540

IEFA in plain words

IEFA is an index equity fund tracking the Core MSCI EAFE. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +18.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.07% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1650 positions, with the top ten at 12.0%.

IXUS in plain words

IXUS is an index equity fund tracking the Core MSCI Total International Stock. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +22.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2540 positions, with the top ten at 14.3%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IEFA or IXUS?
In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IEFA returned +18.0% and IXUS returned +22.2%, so IXUS returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, IEFA or IXUS?
IEFA charges 0.07% a year and IXUS charges 0.07%, so IEFA is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do IEFA and IXUS overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of IEFA and 0% of IXUS by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 57% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

IEFA against IXUS, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 13, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, IEFA against IXUS, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iefa-vs-ixus Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources