Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

AVDV vs IEFA: how they differ

AVDV and IEFA hold 3% of their weight in the same names, and AVDV returned more over the year.

Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF and iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, AVDV and IEFA hold 3% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions AVDV and IEFA both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingAVDVIEFA
Air New Zealand Ltd0.08%0.53%
Bankinter SA0.15%0.05%
Phoenix Financial Ltd0.09%0.05%
ASR Nederland NV0.05%0.05%
Nine Entertainment Co Holdings Ltd0.05%0.14%
Enlight Renewable Energy Ltd0.29%0.04%
AL Sydbank0.35%0.03%
Clal Insurance Enterprises Holdings Ltd0.74%0.03%
Harel Insurance Investments & Financial 0.56%0.03%
Hiscox Ltd0.03%0.03%
ICG PLC0.09%0.03%
Mineral Resources Ltd0.05%0.03%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in AVDVOnly in IEFA
Mitsui Kinzoku Co Ltd 1.38%ASML HOLDING 2.62%
Hudbay Minerals Inc 0.67%HSBC HOLDINGS PLC 1.40%
OceanaGold Corp 0.63%ROCHE PS PAR AG 1.18%
Coeur Mining Inc 0.61%SHELL PLC 1.09%
B2Gold Corp 0.59%MITSUBISHI UFJ FINANCIAL GROUP 1.00%
Whitecap Resources Inc 0.55%NOVARTIS AG 0.99%
Tamarack Valley Energy Ltd 0.51%NESTLE SA 0.97%
Mitsubishi Materials Corp 0.42%ASTRAZENECA PLC 0.94%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Sep 10, 2026.

AVDV and IEFA on the fields both publish, as of Sep 13, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
AVDV
Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF
IEFA
iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerAvantisiShares
What it isInternational Small Cap ValueCore MSCI EAFE
Total return, 1 year+31.0%+18.0%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+13.5 pts+0.5 pts
Expense ratio0.36%0.07%
Already in the S&P 5000.0%0.1%
Holdings17511650

AVDV in plain words

AVDV is an index equity fund tracking the International Small Cap Value. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +31.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.36% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1751 positions, with the top ten at 8.2%.

IEFA in plain words

IEFA is an index equity fund tracking the Core MSCI EAFE. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +18.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.07% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1650 positions, with the top ten at 12.0%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, AVDV or IEFA?
In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, AVDV returned +31.0% and IEFA returned +18.0%, so AVDV returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, AVDV or IEFA?
AVDV charges 0.36% a year and IEFA charges 0.07%, so IEFA is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do AVDV and IEFA overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of AVDV and 0% of IEFA by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 3% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

AVDV against IEFA, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 13, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, AVDV against IEFA, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/avdv-vs-iefa Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources