Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

EMXC vs IEFA: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, EMXC returned +33.8% to IEFA's +12.3%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about EMXC and IEFA

Net assets on Oct 28, 2026: $26.9bn for iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF and $190.4bn for iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF.

At a glance
+33.8%
EMXC total return, 1 year
+12.3%
IEFA total return, 1 year
0.25%
EMXC expense ratio
0.07%
IEFA expense ratio

Pair scorecard

IEFA costs 0.18 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 21.5 points; IEFA is 7.1 times larger.

EMXC vs IEFA: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureEMXCIEFA
Return
Total return, 1 year+33.8%+12.3%
Drawdown
Below its high11.3%, high on Jun 22, 20264.7%, high on Aug 25, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksMSCI Emerging Markets ex China IndexMSCI EAFE IMI Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.25%0.07%
Net assets$26.9bn$190.4bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund42.2%12.3%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Aug 4, 2017 to Oct 23, 2026 · 481 weekly returns
EMXC IEFA
Return
Total return edge EMXC +122.9% +99.9%
Annualized edge EMXC +9.1% +7.8%
Price return edge EMXC +80.5% +51.7%
Risk
Volatility edge IEFA (slight) 19.2% 17.5%
Max drawdown edge IEFA −40.7% −34.1%
Downside capture 97.9% 97.7%
Beta 0.97 1.00
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge EMXC 0.41 0.36
Sortino edge EMXC 0.57 0.51
Treynor 0.098 0.073
Calmar edge IEFA (slight) 0.22 0.23
Against the benchmark
Alpha −0.8% a year +0.8% a year
Alpha t-stat −0.59 0.96
Information ratio −0.30 0.25
Tracking error 3.6% 3.2%

Each against its own benchmark: EMXC against KEMX, Apr 18, 2019 to Oct 23, 2026; IEFA against ACWX, Nov 2, 2012 to Oct 23, 2026.

Reading

EMXC returned more: +122.9% to +99.9%. IEFA swung slightly less: 17.5% to 19.2%. IEFA fell less at its worst: −34.1% to −40.7%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: EMXC vs IEFA: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureEMXCIEFAEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+122.9%+99.9%EMXCPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+9.1%+7.8%EMXCTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+80.5%+51.7%EMXCPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility19.2%17.5%IEFA (slight)Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation13.8%12.5%IEFA (slight)Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−40.7%−34.1%IEFADeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture92.3%98.1%Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture97.9%97.7%Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta0.971.00Not an edgeHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared0.970.96Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.410.36EMXCReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino0.570.51EMXCReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.0980.073Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.220.23IEFA (slight)Annualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkKEMXACWXThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha−0.8% a year+0.8% a yearNot significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat−0.590.96Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−3.3% to +1.8%−0.9% to +2.5%Includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio−0.300.25Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error3.6%3.2%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 481 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, EMXC and IEFA hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first EMXC IEFA
DISCOVERY 0.10% 0.07%
VODACOM GROUP LTD 0.07% 0.12%
SASOL 0.11% 0.04%
AYALA CORP 0.02% 0.04%
PLDT INC 0.01% 0.03%
ABB INDIA LTD 0.04% 0.00%
ABSA GROUP 0.13% 0.00%
AED/USD 0.00% 0.03%
CAPITEC SHS 0.27% 0.00%
MOL HUNGARIAN OIL AND GAS 0.06% 0.00%
PEPKOR HOLDINGS SHS LTD 0.04% 0.00%
PHP/USD 0.00% 0.01%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in EMXC
TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING 19.91%
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS LTD 8.58%
SK HYNIX 6.12%
MEDIATEK 1.92%
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS NON VOTING PRE 1.14%
HON HAI PRECISION INDUSTRY 1.02%
DELTA ELECTRONICS 0.99%
HDFC BANK 0.89%
Only in IEFA
ASML HOLDING 2.55%
ROCHE PS PAR AG 1.36%
SHELL 1.21%
HSBC HOLDINGS PLC 1.18%
NOVARTIS AG 1.14%
ASTRAZENECA PLC 1.04%
NESTLE SA 1.04%
SAP 0.97%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

EMXC iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF IEFA iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Tracks the MSCI EAFE
Total return, 1 year +33.8% +12.3%
Its benchmark over the same days +37.0% (KEMX) +14.3% (ACWX)
Gap to its benchmark −3.2 pts vs KEMX −2.0 pts vs ACWX
Expense ratio 0.25% 0.07%
Already in the S&P 500 0.0% 0.0%
Holdings 696 2629
Net assets $26.9bn $190.4bn

EMXC and IEFA on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-4E54386B71

EMXC and IEFA do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?

  1. What each follows. EMXC follows MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index and IEFA follows MSCI EAFE IMI Index.
  2. Holdings in common. 0% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Oct 27, 2026).
  3. One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 EMXC returned +33.8% and IEFA +12.3% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 21.5 points.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

EMXC and IEFA flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
EMXC

EMXC tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets ex China. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +33.8% with distributions reinvested, against +37.0% for its benchmark, the MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.25% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 696 positions, with the top ten at 42.2%. It sat 11.3% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

IEFA

IEFA tracks the MSCI EAFE. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +12.3% with distributions reinvested, against +14.3% for its benchmark, the MSCI ACWI ex USA Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.07% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2,629 positions, with the top ten at 12.3%. It sat 4.7% below its high of Aug 25, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, EMXC or IEFA?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EMXC returned +33.8% and IEFA +12.3%.
Which is cheaper, EMXC or IEFA?
IEFA is cheaper, by 0.18 percentage points a year. That is about $18 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do EMXC and IEFA overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of EMXC and 0% of IEFA by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, EMXC against IEFA, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/emxc-vs-iefa

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.