ICSH vs JPST: Differences, Returns & Fees

ICSH's duration was 0.7 years on Jul 31, 2026 and JPST's 0.8 on May 31, 2026; ICSH charges 0.08% to JPST's 0.18%. Net assets on Oct 20, 2026: $9.0bn for iShares Ultra Short Duration Bond Active ETF and $42.8bn for JPMorgan Ultra-Short Income ETF.

Ask IQ about this page

Ask IQ about ICSH and JPST

Answers cite the figures on this page.

ICSH costs 0.10 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 0.1 points; JPST is 4.8 times larger.

ICSH vs JPST: Differences, Returns & Fees
ICSHJPST
Expense ratio0.08%0.18%
Net assets$9.0bn$42.8bn
Total return, 1 year+3.5%+3.4%
What it tracksNo index, actively managedNo index, actively managed
Holdings in commonreport dates differ

Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026.

+3.5%
ICSH total return, 1 year
+3.4%
JPST total return, 1 year
0.08%
ICSH expense ratio
0.18%
JPST expense ratio

Get ICSH and JPST fund flows by email, every Monday.

Plus the Friday ETF note. Confirm from the link that arrives, and unsubscribe in one click. See Privacy.

Client brief · page 1 of 2Report BR-A236DBA8F5

ICSH and JPST are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?

  1. Cost. ICSH charges 0.08% of assets a year and JPST 0.18%, a gap of 0.10 points.
  2. Size. ICSH has $9.0bn in net assets and JPST $42.8bn (Net assets); JPST is 4.8 times larger.
  3. What each follows (similar). Both follow No index, actively managed.

Data as of Oct 20, 2026. The differences are picked by a fixed rule, in a fixed order; the PDF prints it. Page 2 has the returns, overlap, risks and sources.

Take this comparison to a client

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Not advice. The brief uses the figures on this page, with the data date and a report id. Saved comparisons are listed on your saved page; privacy.

On the same fields

ICSH
iShares Ultra Short Duration Bond Active ETF
JPST
JPMorgan Ultra-Short Income ETF
Where it sits Bond ETF Bond ETF
What it is Actively managed Actively managed
Total return, 1 year +3.5% +3.4%
Its benchmark over the same days not measured −1.9% (AGG)
Gap to its benchmark not measured +5.4 pts vs AGG
Expense ratio 0.08% 0.18%
Holdings 407 824
Net assets $9.0bn $42.8bn

ICSH and JPST on the fields both publish, as of Oct 20, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

About ICSH

ICSH is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +3.5% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year.

About JPST

JPST is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +3.4% with distributions reinvested, against −1.9% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, ICSH or JPST?
In the year to Oct 20, 2026, with distributions reinvested, ICSH returned +3.5% and JPST +3.4%.
Which is cheaper, ICSH or JPST?
ICSH is cheaper, by 0.10 percentage points a year. That is about $10 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, ICSH against JPST, data as of Oct 20, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/icsh-vs-jpst

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.