BIL vs JPST: Differences, Returns & Fees
BIL's duration was 0.2 years on Jun 30, 2026 and JPST's 0.8 on May 31, 2026; BIL charges 0.14% to JPST's 0.18%. Net assets on Oct 20, 2026: $51.1bn for SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF and $42.8bn for JPMorgan Ultra-Short Income ETF.
BIL costs 0.04 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 0.3 points; BIL is 1.2 times larger.
| BIL | JPST | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.14% | 0.18% |
| Net assets | $51.1bn | $42.8bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +3.7% | +3.4% |
| What it tracks | 1-3 month T-bills | No index, actively managed |
| Holdings in common | report dates differ | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.
BIL and JPST are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?
- What each follows. BIL follows 1-3 month T-bills and JPST follows No index, actively managed.
- Number of holdings. BIL holds 18 positions and JPST holds 824.
- One-year total return (similar). Over 1 year to Oct 20, 2026 BIL returned +3.7% and JPST +3.4% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 0.3 points.
Data as of Oct 20, 2026. The differences are picked by a fixed rule, in a fixed order; the PDF prints it. Page 2 has the returns, overlap, risks and sources.
Take this comparison to a client
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
Not advice. The brief uses the figures on this page, with the data date and a report id. Saved comparisons are listed on your saved page; privacy.
On the same fields
BIL and JPST on the fields both publish, as of Oct 20, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
About BIL
BIL tracks an index of 1-3 month T-bills. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +3.7% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.14% a year.
About JPST
JPST is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +3.4% with distributions reinvested, against −1.9% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, BIL or JPST?
- In the year to Oct 20, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BIL returned +3.7% and JPST +3.4%.
- Which is cheaper, BIL or JPST?
- BIL is cheaper, by 0.04 percentage points a year. That is about $4 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, BIL against JPST, data as of Oct 20, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bil-vs-jpst
ETFIQ. (Oct 20, 2026). BIL against JPST. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bil-vs-jpst
[BIL against JPST (ETFIQ, Oct 20, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bil-vs-jpst)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.