ICOW vs LVHI: Differences, Returns & Fees

ICOW and LVHI hold 14% of their weight in the same names, and LVHI returned +24.7% over the year. Net assets: $1.7bn on Oct 2, 2026 for Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF, and $5.9bn on Oct 9, 2026 for Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF.

LVHI costs 0.25 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 5.4 points.

ICOWLVHI
Expense ratio0.65%0.40%
Net assets, ICOW as of Oct 2, 2026 and LVHI as of Oct 9, 2026$1.7bn$5.9bn
Total return, 1 year+19.3%+24.7%
What it tracksnot read by ETFIQFranklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Hedged Index
Holdings in common14%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund21.2%21.2%
Below its high6.7%, high on Aug 25, 2026

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026.

+19.3%
ICOW total return, 1 year
+24.7%
LVHI total return, 1 year
0.65%
ICOW expense ratio
0.40%
LVHI expense ratio

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, ICOW and LVHI hold 14% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026.

half

14% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding ICOW LVHI
Shell PLC 2.09% 2.30%
Suncor Energy Inc 2.14% 1.90%
Sanofi SA 1.89% 1.18%
Imperial Brands PLC 1.71% 0.85%
Tesco PLC 1.63% 0.78%
Inpex Corp 1.20% 0.69%
Deutsche Post AG 2.19% 0.64%
Vinci SA 1.95% 0.63%
Fortescue Ltd 1.65% 0.62%
Bridgestone Corp 1.40% 0.55%
Koninklijke Ahold Delhaize NV 1.89% 0.44%
Michelin 1.00% 0.39%
Only in ICOW
Takeda Pharmaceutical Co Ltd 2.22%
KDDI Corp 2.20%
Vodafone Group PLC 2.13%
Sony Group Corp 2.12%
BP PLC 2.02%
Deutsche Telekom AG 1.92%
Cie de Saint-Gobain SA 1.86%
Barrick Mining Corp 1.84%
Only in LVHI
BHP GROUP LTD 2.21%
INTESA SANPAOLO SPA 2.19%
BANK OF NOVA SCOTIA (THE) 2.19%
RIO TINTO PLC 2.14%
UNILEVER PLC 2.13%
NOVARTIS AG 2.13%
CANADIAN IMPERIAL BANK OF COMMERCE 2.00%
CANADIAN NATURAL RESOURCES LTD 1.99%

Check overlap with more funds →

On the same fields

ICOW
Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF
LVHI
Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index Tracks an index
Total return, 1 year +19.3% +24.7%
S&P 500 over the same days +17.3% +17.3%
Gap to the S&P 500 +2.0 pts +7.4 pts
Expense ratio 0.65% 0.40%
Already in the S&P 500 0.0% 0.0%
Holdings 100 193
Net assets, ICOW as of Oct 2, 2026 and LVHI as of Oct 9, 2026 $1.7bn $5.9bn

ICOW and LVHI on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

ICOW in plain words

ICOW tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +19.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.65% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 100 positions, with the top ten at 21.2%. It sat 6.7% below its high of Aug 25, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.

LVHI in plain words

LVHI tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +24.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.40% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 193 positions, with the top ten at 21.2%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, ICOW or LVHI?
In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, ICOW returned +19.3% and LVHI +24.7%.
Which is cheaper, ICOW or LVHI?
LVHI is cheaper, by 0.25 percentage points a year. That is about $25 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do ICOW and LVHI overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of ICOW and 0% of LVHI by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, ICOW against LVHI, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/icow-vs-lvhi

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.