Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
HYMB vs XLF: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, HYMB returned −1.0% to XLF's +7.6%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about HYMB and XLFNet assets on Oct 27, 2026: $3.8bn for State Street SPDR Nuveen ICE High Yield Municipal Bond ETF and $51.6bn for State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF.
Pair scorecard
XLF costs 0.27 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 8.6 points; XLF is 13.6 times larger.
| Measure | HYMB | XLF |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | −1.0% | +7.6% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 4.7%, high on Jul 2, 2026 | 3.8%, high on Sep 3, 2026 |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | ICE US Select High Yield Crossover Municipal Index | Financial Select Sector Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.35% | 0.08% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 | $3.8bn | $51.6bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
| In the S&P 500, by weight | 100% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 57.4% | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, HYMB and XLF hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
HYMB and XLF on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
HYMB
HYMB tracks an index of Nuveen ICE High Yield Municipal Bond. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −1.0% with distributions reinvested, against −1.4% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.35% a year. It sat 4.7% below its high of Jul 2, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
XLF
XLF tracks an index of Financials. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +7.6% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 77 positions, with the top ten at 57.4%. It sat 3.8% below its high of Sep 3, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, HYMB or XLF?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, HYMB returned −1.0% and XLF +7.6%.
- Which is cheaper, HYMB or XLF?
- XLF is cheaper, by 0.27 percentage points a year. That is about $27 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, HYMB against XLF, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/hymb-vs-xlf
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). HYMB against XLF. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/hymb-vs-xlf
[HYMB against XLF (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/hymb-vs-xlf)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.