Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
MUB vs XLF: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, MUB returned −0.4% to XLF's +7.6%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about MUB and XLF
Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $54.1bn for iShares National Muni Bond ETF and $51.6bn for State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF.
Pair scorecard
MUB costs 0.03 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 8.0 points.
| Measure | MUB | XLF |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | −0.4% | +7.6% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 3.8%, high on Sep 3, 2026 | |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | ICE AMT-Free US National Municipal Index | Financial Select Sector Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.05% | 0.08% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 | $54.1bn | $51.6bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
| In the S&P 500, by weight | 100% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 57.4% | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, MUB and XLF hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
MUB and XLF on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
MUB
MUB tracks an index of National Muni Bond. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −0.4% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.05% a year.
XLF
XLF tracks an index of Financials. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +7.6% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 77 positions, with the top ten at 57.4%. It sat 3.8% below its high of Sep 3, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, MUB or XLF?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, MUB returned −0.4% and XLF +7.6%.
- Which is cheaper, MUB or XLF?
- MUB is cheaper, by 0.03 percentage points a year. That is about $3 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, MUB against XLF, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/mub-vs-xlf
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). MUB against XLF. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/mub-vs-xlf
[MUB against XLF (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/mub-vs-xlf)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.