Which returned more over the last year, MUB or XLF?

In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, MUB returned +0.1% and XLF returned +7.6%, so XLF returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, MUB or XLF?

MUB charges 0.05% a year and XLF charges 0.08%, so MUB is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

MUB vs XLF: how they differ

MUB and XLF hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and XLF returned more over the year.

iShares National Muni Bond ETF and State Street(R) Financial Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, MUB and XLF hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in MUB	Only in XLF
HOUSTON TEX HIGHER ED FIN CORP 0.13%	JPMORGAN CHASE + CO 11.81%
DISTRICT COLUMBIA UNIV REV 0.10%	BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC CL B 11.59%
ECTOR CNTY TEX 0.08%	VISA INC CLASS A SHARES 7.60%
NEW ORLEANS LA 0.08%	MASTERCARD INC A 5.69%
PORT TACOMA WASH REV 0.08%	BANK OF AMERICA CORP 5.09%
CONTRA COSTA CALIF CMNTY COLLE 0.06%	GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP INC 3.75%
LOS ANGELES CALIF 0.06%	WELLS FARGO + CO 3.41%
LOS ANGELES CNTY CALIF 0.06%	MORGAN STANLEY 3.18%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 10, 2026.

MUB and XLF on the fields both publish, as of Sep 13, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	MUB iShares National Muni Bond ETF	XLF State Street(R) Financial Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	iShares	State Street
What it is	National Muni Bond	Financials
Total return, 1 year	+0.1%	+7.6%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	−17.4 pts	−9.9 pts
Expense ratio	0.05%	0.08%
Holdings	5215	79

MUB in plain words

MUB is a bond fund tracking the National Muni Bond. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +0.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.05% a year. It sat 3.6% below its high of Jul 6, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

XLF in plain words

XLF is an index equity fund tracking the Financials. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +7.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 79 positions, with the top ten at 57.3%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, MUB or XLF?: In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, MUB returned +0.1% and XLF returned +7.6%, so XLF returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, MUB or XLF?: MUB charges 0.05% a year and XLF charges 0.08%, so MUB is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

MUB against XLF, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 13, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, MUB against XLF, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/mub-vs-xlf Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources