Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

HYMB vs KRE: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, HYMB returned −1.0% to KRE's +21.2%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about HYMB and KRE

Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $3.8bn for State Street SPDR Nuveen ICE High Yield Municipal Bond ETF and $4.2bn for State Street SPDR S&P Regional Banking ETF.

At a glance
−1.0%
HYMB total return, 1 year
+21.2%
KRE total return, 1 year
0.35%
HYMB expense ratio
0.35%
KRE expense ratio

Pair scorecard

Both cost 0.35% a year; their one-year returns differ by 22.2 points; KRE is 1.1 times larger.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

HYMB vs KRE: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureHYMBKRE
Return
Total return, 1 year−1.0%+21.2%
Drawdown
Below its high4.7%, high on Jul 2, 20266.9%, high on Aug 14, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksICE US Select High Yield Crossover Municipal IndexS&P Regional Banks Select Industry Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.35%0.35%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$3.8bn$4.2bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight7%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund11.6%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Apr 21, 2011 to Oct 23, 2026 · 809 weekly returns
HYMB KRE
Return
Total return edge KRE +84.8% +296.7%
Annualized edge KRE +4.0% +9.3%
Price return edge KRE −4.7% +178.5%
Risk
Volatility edge HYMB 8.7% 28.1%
Max drawdown edge HYMB −22.5% −52.6%
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge KRE 0.31 0.40
Sortino edge KRE 0.42 0.58
Calmar edge Tie 0.18 0.18
Reading

KRE returned more: +296.7% to +84.8%. HYMB swung less: 8.7% to 28.1%. HYMB fell less at its worst: −22.5% to −52.6%.

Full scorecard

9 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: HYMB vs KRE: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureHYMBKREEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+84.8%+296.7%KREPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+4.0%+9.3%KRETotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return−4.7%+178.5%KREPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility8.7%28.1%HYMBSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation6.4%19.2%HYMBLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−22.5%−52.6%HYMBDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.310.40KREReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino0.420.58KREReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Calmar0.180.18TieAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 809 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, HYMB and KRE hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first HYMB KRE
Only in one fund ↓
Only in HYMB
PRCGEN 5.000 07/01/58 1.94%
PRCGEN 4.784 07/01/58 1.25%
BUCGEN 5.000 06/01/55 1.08%
PRC 4.000 07/01/46 0.64%
PRCGEN 4.329 07/01/40 0.61%
NYCDEV 5.000 11/15/44 0.49%
PRC 4.000 07/01/41 0.47%
CHIEDU 6.000 12/01/41 0.46%
Only in KRE
GLACIER BANCORP INC 1.20%
UNITED COMMUNITY BANKS 1.17%
BANK OZK 1.17%
COLUMBIA BANKING SYSTEM INC 1.17%
EASTERN BANKSHARES INC 1.16%
TEXAS CAPITAL BANCSHARES INC 1.16%
UNITED BANKSHARES INC 1.16%
VALLEY NATIONAL BANCORP 1.15%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

HYMB State Street SPDR Nuveen ICE High Yield Municipal Bond ETF KRE State Street SPDR S&P Regional Banking ETF
Where it sits Bond ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index of Nuveen ICE High Yield Municipal Bond Tracks the S&P Regional Banking
Total return, 1 year −1.0% +21.2%
Its benchmark over the same days −1.4% (AGG) not measured
Gap to its benchmark +0.4 pts vs AGG not measured
Expense ratio 0.35% 0.35%
Holdings 2105 167
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 $3.8bn $4.2bn

HYMB and KRE on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-9AD88C3756

HYMB and KRE do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?

  1. What each follows. HYMB follows ICE US Select High Yield Crossover Municipal Index and KRE follows S&P Regional Banks Select Industry Index.
  2. Holdings in common. 0% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Oct 27, 2026).
  3. One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 HYMB returned −1.0% and KRE +21.2% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 22.2 points.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

HYMB and KRE flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
HYMB

HYMB tracks an index of Nuveen ICE High Yield Municipal Bond. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −1.0% with distributions reinvested, against −1.4% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.35% a year. It sat 4.7% below its high of Jul 2, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

KRE

KRE tracks the S&P Regional Banking. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +21.2% with distributions reinvested. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 7% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 167 positions, with the top ten at 11.6%. It sat 6.9% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, HYMB or KRE?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, HYMB returned −1.0% and KRE +21.2%.
Which is cheaper, HYMB or KRE?
Neither: HYMB and KRE both charge 0.35% a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, HYMB against KRE, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/hymb-vs-kre

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.