HYLS vs JBBB: Differences, Returns & Fees

Over the year HYLS returned +0.2% to JBBB's +4.9%, and JBBB charges 0.47% to HYLS's 0.69%. Net assets: $1.6bn on Oct 20, 2026 for First Trust Tactical High Yield ETF, and $1.4bn on Jul 31, 2026 for Janus Henderson B-BBB CLO ETF.

Ask IQ about this page

Ask IQ about HYLS and JBBB

Answers cite the figures on this page.

JBBB costs 0.22 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 4.7 points; HYLS is 1.2 times larger.

HYLS vs JBBB: Differences, Returns & Fees
HYLSJBBB
Expense ratio0.69%0.47%
Net assets, as of Jul 31, 2026$1.6bn$1.4bn
Total return, 1 year+0.2%+4.9%
What it tracksNo index, actively managedNo index, actively managed
Holdings in commonnot published
+0.2%
HYLS total return, 1 year
+4.9%
JBBB total return, 1 year
0.69%
HYLS expense ratio
0.47%
JBBB expense ratio

Get HYLS's fund flows by email, every Monday.

Plus the Friday ETF note. Confirm from the link that arrives, and unsubscribe in one click. See Privacy.

Client brief · page 1 of 2Report BR-068AA69870

HYLS and JBBB are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?

  1. One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 20, 2026 HYLS returned +0.2% and JBBB +4.9% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 4.7 points.
  2. Cost. HYLS charges 0.69% of assets a year and JBBB 0.47%, a gap of 0.22 points.
  3. What each follows (similar). Both follow No index, actively managed.

Data as of Oct 20, 2026. The differences are picked by a fixed rule, in a fixed order; the PDF prints it. Page 2 has the returns, overlap, risks and sources.

Take this comparison to a client

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Not advice. The brief uses the figures on this page, with the data date and a report id. Saved comparisons are listed on your saved page; privacy.

On the same fields

HYLS
First Trust Tactical High Yield ETF
JBBB
Janus Henderson B-BBB CLO ETF
Where it sits Bond ETF Bond ETF
What it is Actively managed Actively managed
Total return, 1 year +0.2% +4.9%
Its benchmark over the same days +1.2% (USHY) not measured
Gap to its benchmark −1.0 pts vs USHY not measured
Expense ratio 0.69% 0.47%
Holdings 332 239
Net assets, HYLS as of Oct 20, 2026 and JBBB as of Jul 31, 2026 $1.6bn $1.4bn

HYLS and JBBB on the fields both publish, as of Oct 20, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

About HYLS

HYLS is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +0.2% with distributions reinvested, against +1.2% for its benchmark, the ICE BofA US High Yield Constrained Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.69% a year.

About JBBB

JBBB is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +4.9% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.47% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, HYLS or JBBB?
In the year to Oct 20, 2026, with distributions reinvested, HYLS returned +0.2% and JBBB +4.9%.
Which is cheaper, HYLS or JBBB?
JBBB is cheaper, by 0.22 percentage points a year. That is about $22 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, HYLS against JBBB, data as of Oct 20, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/hyls-vs-jbbb

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.