ANGL vs HYLS: Differences, Returns & Fees
On Jul 31, 2026 ANGL's duration was 4.5 years and HYLS's 2.9; ANGL charges 0.25% to HYLS's 0.69%. Net assets: $3.0bn on Oct 19, 2026 for VanEck Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF, and $1.6bn on Oct 20, 2026 for First Trust Tactical High Yield ETF.
ANGL costs 0.44 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 1.4 points; ANGL is 1.9 times larger.
| ANGL | HYLS | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.25% | 0.69% |
| Net assets | $2.9bn | $1.6bn |
| Total return, 1 year | −1.2% | +0.2% |
| What it tracks | ICE US Fallen Angel High Yield 10% Constrained Index | No index, actively managed |
| Holdings in common | not published | |
| Below its high | 5.1%, high on Aug 25, 2026 | |
ANGL and HYLS are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?
- What each follows. ANGL follows ICE US Fallen Angel High Yield 10% Constrained Index and HYLS follows No index, actively managed.
- Cost. ANGL charges 0.25% of assets a year and HYLS 0.69%, a gap of 0.44 points.
- One-year total return (similar). Over 1 year to Oct 20, 2026 ANGL returned −1.2% and HYLS +0.2% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 1.4 points.
Data as of Oct 20, 2026. The differences are picked by a fixed rule, in a fixed order; the PDF prints it. Page 2 has the returns, overlap, risks and sources.
Take this comparison to a client
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
Not advice. The brief uses the figures on this page, with the data date and a report id. Saved comparisons are listed on your saved page; privacy.
On the same fields
ANGL and HYLS on the fields both publish, as of Oct 20, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
About ANGL
ANGL tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned −1.2% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.25% a year. It sat 5.1% below its high of Aug 25, 2026 on Oct 20, 2026.
About HYLS
HYLS is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +0.2% with distributions reinvested, against +1.2% for its benchmark, the ICE BofA US High Yield Constrained Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.69% a year.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, ANGL or HYLS?
- In the year to Oct 20, 2026, with distributions reinvested, ANGL returned −1.2% and HYLS +0.2%.
- Which is cheaper, ANGL or HYLS?
- ANGL is cheaper, by 0.44 percentage points a year. That is about $44 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, ANGL against HYLS, data as of Oct 20, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/angl-vs-hyls
ETFIQ. (Oct 20, 2026). ANGL against HYLS. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/angl-vs-hyls
[ANGL against HYLS (ETFIQ, Oct 20, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/angl-vs-hyls)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.