A
vs
B
Share
Compare their flowsAsk IQ about these two funds

JBBB vs NHYB: Differences, Returns & Fees

Over the year JBBB returned +4.9% to NHYB's +1.5%, and NHYB charges 0.08% to JBBB's 0.47%. Net assets on Jul 31, 2026: $1.4bn for Janus Henderson B-BBB CLO ETF and $1.7bn for Nuveen High Yield Corporate Bond ETF.

Ask IQ about this page

Ask IQ about JBBB and NHYB

Answers cite the figures on this page.

NHYB costs 0.39 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 3.4 points; NHYB is 1.2 times larger.

JBBB vs NHYB: Differences, Returns & Fees
JBBBNHYB
Expense ratio0.47%0.08%
Net assets, as of Jul 31, 2026$1.4bn$1.7bn
Total return, 1 year+4.9%+1.5%
What it tracksNo index, actively managedICE BofA BB-B U.S. Cash Pay High Yield Constrained Index
Holdings in common0%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jul 31, 2026.

+4.9%
JBBB total return, 1 year
+1.5%
NHYB total return, 1 year
0.47%
JBBB expense ratio
0.08%
NHYB expense ratio

Get the week's ETF fund flows by email, every Monday.

Plus the Friday ETF note. Confirm from the link that arrives, and unsubscribe in one click. See Privacy.

Client brief · page 1 of 2Report BR-63957A4CB5

JBBB and NHYB are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?

  1. What each follows. JBBB follows No index, actively managed and NHYB follows ICE BofA BB-B U.S. Cash Pay High Yield Constrained Index.
  2. Holdings in common. 0% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Jul 31, 2026).
  3. One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 20, 2026 JBBB returned +4.9% and NHYB +1.5% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 3.4 points.

Data as of Oct 20, 2026. The differences are picked by a fixed rule, in a fixed order; the PDF prints it. Page 2 has the returns, overlap, risks and sources.

Take this comparison to a client

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Not advice. The brief uses the figures on this page, with the data date and a report id. Saved comparisons are listed on your saved page; privacy.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, JBBB and NHYB hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026.

half

0% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding JBBB NHYB
Only in JBBB
Janus Henderson AAA CLO ETF 3.56%
Tikehau US CLO VII Ltd., Series 2025-1A, Class D1, due Feb 25, 2038 1.79%
Regatta XVIII Funding Ltd., Series 2021-1A, Class D1R, due Apr 15, 2038 1.63%
Palmer Square CLO Ltd., Series 2024-2A, Class D1R, due Jul 20, 2038 1.42%
Tikehau US CLO VI Ltd., Series 2024-1A, Class D1, due Jul 18, 2037 1.41%
Sound Point CLO 2025R-1 Ltd., Series 2025-1RA, Class D1, due Feb 20, 2038 1.18%
AGL CLO 39 Ltd., Series 2025-39A, Class D1, due Apr 20, 2038 1.11%
Regatta X Funding Ltd., Series 2017-3A, Class D1R2, due Jul 17, 2037 1.10%
Only in NHYB
State Street Institutional US Government Money Market Fund 0.62%
1261229 BC Ltd, due Apr 15, 2032 0.47%
EchoStar Corp, due Nov 30, 2029 0.42%
Meridian Arc Holdco LLC, due Apr 30, 2031 0.35%
Centene Corp, due Aug 1, 2031 0.33%
PR RNO Property Owner 1 LLC, due May 1, 2031 0.29%
CCO Holdings LLC / CCO Holdings Capital Corp, due Feb 1, 2031 0.29%
Cloud Software Group LLC, due Sep 30, 2029 0.29%

Check overlap with more funds →

On the same fields

JBBB
Janus Henderson B-BBB CLO ETF
NHYB
Nuveen High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
Where it sits Bond ETF Bond ETF
Issuer Janus Henderson Nuveen
What it is Actively managed Tracks an index
Total return, 1 year +4.9% +1.5%
Its benchmark over the same days not measured −1.9% (AGG)
Gap to its benchmark not measured +3.5 pts vs AGG
Expense ratio 0.47% 0.08%
Holdings 239 1680
Net assets, as of Jul 31, 2026 $1.4bn $1.7bn

JBBB and NHYB on the fields both publish, as of Oct 20, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

About JBBB

JBBB is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +4.9% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.47% a year.

About NHYB

NHYB tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +1.5% with distributions reinvested, against −1.9% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, JBBB or NHYB?
In the year to Oct 20, 2026, with distributions reinvested, JBBB returned +4.9% and NHYB +1.5%.
Which is cheaper, JBBB or NHYB?
NHYB is cheaper, by 0.39 percentage points a year. That is about $39 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
HYDB vs JBBBJBBB vs JPHYFLHY vs JBBBHYGV vs JBBBHYDB vs NHYBNHYB vs PHYLFALN vs NHYBFLHY vs NHYB
JBBB on its own →NHYB on its own →Hold both: look the portfolio through →Rankings →JBBB dividend history →JBBB holdings →NHYB dividend history →NHYB holdings →Standards and sources →
Where these figures came from
JBBB filings on SEC EDGAR ↗JBBB prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗Janus Henderson website ↗NHYB filings on SEC EDGAR ↗NHYB prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗Nuveen website ↗

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, JBBB against NHYB, data as of Oct 20, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/jbbb-vs-nhyb

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.