Which returned more over the last year, FLHY or JBBB?

In the year to Oct 20, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FLHY returned +2.0% and JBBB +4.9%.

Which is cheaper, FLHY or JBBB?

FLHY is cheaper, by 0.07 percentage points a year. That is about $7 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Share on X Download as PDF

Compare their flows Ask IQ about these two funds

FLHY vs JBBB: Differences, Returns & Fees

Over the year FLHY returned +2.0% to JBBB's +4.9%, and FLHY charges 0.40% to JBBB's 0.47%. Net assets: $1.2bn on Oct 20, 2026 for Franklin High Yield Corporate ETF, and $1.4bn on Jul 31, 2026 for Janus Henderson B-BBB CLO ETF.

Ask IQ about this page

Ask IQ about FLHY and JBBB

Answers cite the figures on this page.

FLHY costs 0.07 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 2.9 points.

FLHY vs JBBB: Differences, Returns & Fees
	FLHY	JBBB
Expense ratio	0.40%	0.47%
Net assets, FLHY as of Oct 20, 2026 and JBBB as of Jul 31, 2026	$1.2bn	$1.4bn
Total return, 1 year	+2.0%	+4.9%
What it tracks	No index, actively managed	No index, actively managed
Holdings in common	0%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026.

+2.0%

FLHY total return, 1 year

+4.9%

JBBB total return, 1 year

0.40%

FLHY expense ratio

0.47%

JBBB expense ratio

Client brief · page 1 of 2Report BR-E4AF2D9298

FLHY and JBBB are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?

Holdings in common. 0% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026).
One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 20, 2026 FLHY returned +2.0% and JBBB +4.9% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 2.9 points.
What each follows (similar). Both follow No index, actively managed.

Data as of Oct 20, 2026. The differences are picked by a fixed rule, in a fixed order; the PDF prints it. Page 2 has the returns, overlap, risks and sources.

Take this comparison to a client

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Not advice. The brief uses the figures on this page, with the data date and a report id. Saved comparisons are listed on your saved page; privacy.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, FLHY and JBBB hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026.

50%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first

Holding FLHY JBBB

Only in FLHY

DVA 4.625 06/01/30 144A, due Jun 1, 2030 0.93%

AROC 6 02/01/34 144A, due Feb 1, 2034 0.89%

SKX 10 07/15/33 144a, due Jul 15, 2033 0.87%

THS 7.75 02/11/33 144A, due Feb 11, 2033 0.85%

PETM 7.5 09/15/32, due Sep 15, 2032 0.83%

APLD 9.25 12/15/30 144A, due Dec 15, 2030 0.83%

KEDRIM 6.5 09/01/29 144A, due Sep 1, 2029 0.81%

PSDO 7.5 06/01/31 144A, due Jun 1, 2031 0.81%

Only in JBBB

Janus Henderson AAA CLO ETF 3.56%

Tikehau US CLO VII Ltd., Series 2025-1A, Class D1, due Feb 25, 2038 1.79%

Regatta XVIII Funding Ltd., Series 2021-1A, Class D1R, due Apr 15, 2038 1.63%

Palmer Square CLO Ltd., Series 2024-2A, Class D1R, due Jul 20, 2038 1.42%

Tikehau US CLO VI Ltd., Series 2024-1A, Class D1, due Jul 18, 2037 1.41%

Sound Point CLO 2025R-1 Ltd., Series 2025-1RA, Class D1, due Feb 20, 2038 1.18%

AGL CLO 39 Ltd., Series 2025-39A, Class D1, due Apr 20, 2038 1.11%

Regatta X Funding Ltd., Series 2017-3A, Class D1R2, due Jul 17, 2037 1.10%

Check overlap with more funds →

On the same fields

FLHY

Franklin High Yield Corporate ETF

JBBB

Janus Henderson B-BBB CLO ETF

Where it sits Bond ETF Bond ETF

Issuer Franklin Janus Henderson

What it is Actively managed Actively managed

Total return, 1 year +2.0% +4.9%

Its benchmark over the same days +1.2% (USHY) not measured

Gap to its benchmark +0.8 pts vs USHY not measured

Expense ratio 0.40% 0.47%

Holdings 289 239

Net assets, FLHY as of Oct 20, 2026 and JBBB as of Jul 31, 2026 $1.2bn $1.4bn

FLHY and JBBB on the fields both publish, as of Oct 20, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

About FLHY

FLHY is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +2.0% with distributions reinvested, against +1.2% for its benchmark, the ICE BofA U.S. High Yield Constrained Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.40% a year.

About JBBB

JBBB is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +4.9% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.47% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, FLHY or JBBB?: In the year to Oct 20, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FLHY returned +2.0% and JBBB +4.9%.
Which is cheaper, FLHY or JBBB?: FLHY is cheaper, by 0.07 percentage points a year. That is about $7 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

FLHY vs HYLS FLHY vs HYG FLHY vs USHY FLHY vs HYDB JBBB vs JNK JBBB vs SHYG JBBB vs SPHY JBBB vs USHY

FLHY on its own →JBBB on its own →Hold both: look the portfolio through →Rankings →FLHY dividend history →FLHY holdings →JBBB dividend history →JBBB holdings →Standards and sources →

Where these figures came from

FLHY filings on SEC EDGAR ↗FLHY prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗Franklin website ↗JBBB filings on SEC EDGAR ↗JBBB prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗Janus Henderson website ↗

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, FLHY against JBBB, data as of Oct 20, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/flhy-vs-jbbb

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.