Data as of Nov 4, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

GSLC vs LRGF: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, GSLC returned +13.3% to LRGF's +13.7%; 64% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about GSLC and LRGF

Net assets on Nov 3, 2026: $15.3bn for Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF and $3.6bn for iShares U.S. Equity Factor ETF.

At a glance
+13.3%
GSLC total return, 1 year
+13.7%
LRGF total return, 1 year
0.09%
GSLC expense ratio
0.08%
LRGF expense ratio

Pair scorecard

LRGF costs 0.01 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 0.4 points; GSLC is 4.3 times larger.

GSLC vs LRGF: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureGSLCLRGF
Return
Total return, 1 year+13.3%+13.7%
Benchmark
What it tracksGoldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity IndexSTOXX U.S. Equity Factor Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.09%0.08%
Net assets, as of Nov 3, 2026$15.3bn$3.6bn
Holdings
Holdings in common64%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund35.2%34.5%

Method

Risk and return

Oct 2, 2015 to Oct 30, 2026 · 578 weekly returns
GSLC LRGF
Return
Total return edge GSLC (slight) +327.4% +299.8%
Annualized edge GSLC (slight) +14.0% +13.3%
Price return edge GSLC +263.1% +233.5%
Risk
Volatility edge GSLC (slight) 16.7% 17.5%
Max drawdown edge GSLC (slight) −31.8% −33.9%
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge GSLC (slight) 0.73 0.67
Sortino edge GSLC (slight) 1.05 0.96
Calmar edge GSLC 0.44 0.39
Reading

From Oct 2015 to Oct 2026, GSLC returned slightly more: +327.4% to +299.8%. GSLC swung slightly less: 16.7% to 17.5%. GSLC fell slightly less at its worst: −31.8% to −33.9%.

Full scorecard

9 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: GSLC vs LRGF: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureGSLCLRGFEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+327.4%+299.8%GSLC (slight)Price change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+14.0%+13.3%GSLC (slight)Total return as a yearly rate.
Price return+263.1%+233.5%GSLCPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility16.7%17.5%GSLC (slight)Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation11.6%12.2%GSLC (slight)Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−31.8%−33.9%GSLC (slight)Deepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.730.67GSLC (slight)Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino1.050.96GSLC (slight)Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Calmar0.440.39GSLCAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 578 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

64%

By the books each fund has filed, GSLC and LRGF hold 64% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Nov 3, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

64% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first GSLC LRGF
NVIDIA CORP 8.02% 7.08%
APPLE INC 6.96% 6.90%
MICROSOFT CORP 5.32% 5.39%
AMAZON.COM INC 3.52% 3.17%
BROADCOM INC 2.32% 2.46%
META PLATFORMS INC 1.86% 1.86%
ALPHABET INC 1.79% 3.25%
JP MORGAN CHASE & COMPANY 1.26% 1.52%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC 1.24% 1.23%
ELI LILLY & COMPANY 1.22% 1.45%
TESLA INC 1.03% 1.27%
JOHNSON & JOHNSON 0.85% 1.19%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in GSLC
W.W. GRAINGER INC 0.39%
NATERA INC 0.37%
HOME DEPOT INC (THE) 0.36%
COLGATE-PALMOLIVE COMPANY 0.33%
FASTENAL COMPANY 0.32%
WARNER BROS. DISCOVERY INC 0.31%
AMERIPRISE FINANCIAL INC 0.27%
DOLLAR TREE INC 0.27%
Only in LRGF
GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP 0.51%
SPACE EXPLORATION TECHNOLOGIES COR 0.48%
DOCUSIGN 0.36%
EATON PLC 0.35%
MEDPACE HOLDINGS 0.34%
MUELLER INDUSTRIES INC 0.32%
SPOTIFY TECHNOLOGY 0.31%
BEST BUY 0.29%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

GSLC Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF LRGF iShares U.S. Equity Factor ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index Tracks an index
Total return, 1 year +13.3% +13.7%
Its benchmark over the same days +14.8% (VOO) not measured
Gap to its benchmark −1.5 pts vs VOO not measured
Expense ratio 0.09% 0.08%
Already in the S&P 500 93.7% 88.8%
Holdings 426 303
Net assets, as of Nov 3, 2026 $15.3bn $3.6bn

GSLC and LRGF on the fields both publish, as of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief:

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

LRGF flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
GSLC

GSLC tracks an index. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 it returned +13.3% with distributions reinvested, against +14.8% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year. By its holdings filed for Aug 31, 2026, 94% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 426 positions, with the top ten at 35.2%.

LRGF

LRGF tracks an index. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 it returned +13.7% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Nov 3, 2026, 89% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 303 positions, with the top ten at 34.5%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, GSLC or LRGF?
In the year to Nov 4, 2026, with distributions reinvested, GSLC returned +13.3% and LRGF +13.7%.
Which is cheaper, GSLC or LRGF?
LRGF is cheaper, by 0.01 percentage points a year. That is about $1 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do GSLC and LRGF overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 94% of GSLC and 89% of LRGF by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, GSLC against LRGF, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/gslc-vs-lrgf

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.