GSLC vs IWB: Differences, Returns & Fees
GSLC and IWB hold 74% of their weight in the same names, and IWB returned +16.6% over the year. Net assets: $15.3bn on Oct 8, 2026 for Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF, and $49.6bn on Oct 9, 2026 for iShares Russell 1000 ETF.
GSLC costs 0.06 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 1.8 points; IWB is 3.2 times larger.
| GSLC | IWB | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.09% | 0.15% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 8, 2026 | $15.3bn | $49.4bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +14.8% | +16.6% |
| What it tracks | Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity Index | Russell 1000 Index |
| Holdings in common | 74% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 36.1% | 36.1% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, GSLC and IWB hold 74% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.
half
74% in common
On the same fields
GSLC and IWB on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
About GSLC
GSLC tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +14.8% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 435 positions, with the top ten at 36.1%.
About IWB
IWB tracks the Russell 1000. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +16.6% with distributions reinvested, against +16.8% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 9, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,025 positions, with the top ten at 36.1%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, GSLC or IWB?
- In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, GSLC returned +14.8% and IWB +16.6%.
- Which is cheaper, GSLC or IWB?
- GSLC is cheaper, by 0.06 percentage points a year. That is about $6 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, GSLC against IWB, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/gslc-vs-iwb
ETFIQ. (Oct 9, 2026). GSLC against IWB. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/gslc-vs-iwb
[GSLC against IWB (ETFIQ, Oct 9, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/gslc-vs-iwb)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.