Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
IWB vs XLG: how they differ
IWB and XLG hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and IWB returned more over the year.
iShares Russell 1000 ETF and Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, IWB and XLG hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in IWB | Only in XLG |
|---|---|
| NVIDIA 7.26% | NVIDIA Corp 12.79% |
| APPLE 6.73% | Apple Inc 11.58% |
| MICROSOFT 5.21% | Microsoft Corp 8.83% |
| AMAZON.COM INC 3.49% | Amazon.com Inc 5.95% |
| ALPHABET CLASS A 2.77% | Alphabet Inc 4.71% |
| BROADCOM INC 2.40% | Broadcom Inc 4.12% |
| ALPHABET CLASS C 2.24% | Alphabet Inc 3.77% |
| META PLATFORMS CLASS A 2.02% | Meta Platforms Inc 3.42% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 10, 2026.
| IWB iShares Russell 1000 ETF | XLG Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | iShares | Invesco |
| What it is | Russell 1000 | S&P 500 top 50 |
| Total return, 1 year | +16.7% | +12.2% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −0.8 pts | −5.3 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.15% | 0.20% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 91.9% | 100.0% |
| Holdings | 945 | 52 |
IWB in plain words
IWB is an index equity fund tracking the Russell 1000. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +16.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 945 positions, with the top ten at 35.2%.
XLG in plain words
XLG is an index equity fund tracking the S&P 500 top 50. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +12.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.20% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 52 positions, with the top ten at 60.3%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, IWB or XLG?
- In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IWB returned +16.7% and XLG returned +12.2%, so IWB returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, IWB or XLG?
- IWB charges 0.15% a year and XLG charges 0.20%, so IWB is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do IWB and XLG overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 92% of IWB and 100% of XLG by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, IWB against XLG, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwb-vs-xlg Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources