GSID vs IEFA: Differences, Returns & Fees
GSID and IEFA hold 79% of their weight in the same names. Net assets: $965m on Oct 8, 2026 for Goldman Sachs MarketBeta International Equity ETF, and $189.5bn on Oct 9, 2026 for iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF.
IEFA costs 0.13 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 0.1 points; IEFA is far larger, $188.1bn against $965m.
| GSID | IEFA | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.20% | 0.07% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 8, 2026 | $965m | $188.1bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +14.0% | +13.9% |
| What it tracks | Solactive GBS Developed Markets ex North America Large & Mid Cap Index | MSCI EAFE IMI Index |
| Holdings in common | 79% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 13.2% | 12.2% |
| Below its high | 5.0%, high on Aug 25, 2026 | 4.8%, high on Aug 25, 2026 |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Oct 8, 2026.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, GSID and IEFA hold 79% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Oct 8, 2026.
half
79% in common
On the same fields
GSID and IEFA on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
GSID in plain words
GSID tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +14.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.20% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 892 positions, with the top ten at 13.2%. It sat 5.0% below its high of Aug 25, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.
IEFA in plain words
IEFA tracks the MSCI EAFE. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +13.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.07% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 8, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2,628 positions, with the top ten at 12.2%. It sat 4.8% below its high of Aug 25, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, GSID or IEFA?
- In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, GSID returned +14.0% and IEFA +13.9%.
- Which is cheaper, GSID or IEFA?
- IEFA is cheaper, by 0.13 percentage points a year. That is about $13 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, GSID against IEFA, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/gsid-vs-iefa
ETFIQ. (Oct 9, 2026). GSID against IEFA. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/gsid-vs-iefa
[GSID against IEFA (ETFIQ, Oct 9, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/gsid-vs-iefa)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.