EFA vs GSID: Differences, Returns & Fees
EFA and GSID hold 83% of their weight in the same names. Net assets: $76.5bn on Oct 9, 2026 for iShares MSCI EAFE ETF, and $965m on Oct 8, 2026 for Goldman Sachs MarketBeta International Equity ETF.
GSID costs 0.12 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 0.2 points; EFA is far larger, $76.0bn against $965m.
| EFA | GSID | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.32% | 0.20% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 8, 2026 | $76.0bn | $965m |
| Total return, 1 year | +13.8% | +14.0% |
| What it tracks | MSCI EAFE Index | Solactive GBS Developed Markets ex North America Large & Mid Cap Index |
| Holdings in common | 83% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 14.2% | 13.2% |
| Below its high | 5.0%, high on Aug 25, 2026 | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Oct 8, 2026.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, EFA and GSID hold 83% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Oct 8, 2026.
half
83% in common
On the same fields
EFA and GSID on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
EFA in plain words
EFA tracks an index of Developed markets ex US. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +13.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.32% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 8, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 659 positions, with the top ten at 14.2%. It sat 5.0% below its high of Aug 25, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.
GSID in plain words
GSID tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +14.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.20% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 892 positions, with the top ten at 13.2%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, EFA or GSID?
- In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EFA returned +13.8% and GSID +14.0%.
- Which is cheaper, EFA or GSID?
- GSID is cheaper, by 0.12 percentage points a year. That is about $12 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, EFA against GSID, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/efa-vs-gsid
ETFIQ. (Oct 9, 2026). EFA against GSID. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/efa-vs-gsid
[EFA against GSID (ETFIQ, Oct 9, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/efa-vs-gsid)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.