Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

GLD vs UGL: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, GLD returned +2.5% to UGL's −8.8%, and GLD charges 0.40% to UGL's 0.95%.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about GLD and UGL

Net assets: $135.8bn on Oct 27, 2026 for SPDR Gold Shares, and $672m on Oct 28, 2026 for ProShares Ultra Gold.

At a glance
+2.5%
GLD total return, 1 year
−8.8%
UGL total return, 1 year
0.40%
GLD expense ratio
0.95%
UGL expense ratio

Pair scorecard

GLD costs 0.55 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 11.3 points; GLD is far larger, $135.8bn against $680m.

GLD vs UGL: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureGLDUGL
Return
Total return, 1 year+2.5%−8.8%
What its daily multiple gave, 3 months−0.1%
What the underlying did, 3 monthsGLD 0.7%
What the underlying did, 3 monthsGLD 0.7%
The multiple over the whole window2 times gives +1.4%
Drawdown
Below its high24.7%, high on Jan 29, 2026
Against its benchmark
What it tracksGoldGold
Against its daily multiple, 3 months1.1 points short
Against the whole-window multiple2.6 points short
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.40%0.95%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$135.8bn$680m
Holdings
Holdings in commonnot published

Method

Risk and return

Dec 12, 2008 to Oct 23, 2026 · 932 weekly returns
GLD UGL
Return
Total return edge UGL +353.7% +508.2%
Annualized edge UGL +8.8% +10.6%
Price return edge UGL +353.7% +508.2%
Risk
Volatility edge GLD 16.0% 32.3%
Max drawdown edge GLD −44.7% −75.0%
Downside capture 99.9% 144.7%
Beta 1.00 2.01
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge GLD 0.52 0.43
Sortino edge GLD 0.76 0.63
Treynor 0.097 0.069
Calmar edge GLD 0.20 0.14
Against the benchmark
Alpha −0.1% a year −2.8% a year
Alpha t-stat −0.57 −5.48
Information ratio −0.18 0.34
Tracking error 0.7% 16.4%

Each against its own benchmark: GLD against IAU, Feb 4, 2005 to Oct 23, 2026; UGL against GLD, Dec 12, 2008 to Oct 23, 2026.

Reading

UGL returned more: +508.2% to +353.7%. GLD swung less: 16.0% to 32.3%. GLD fell less at its worst: −44.7% to −75.0%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: GLD vs UGL: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureGLDUGLEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+353.7%+508.2%UGLPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+8.8%+10.6%UGLTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+353.7%+508.2%UGLPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility16.0%32.3%GLDSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation10.9%21.9%GLDLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−44.7%−75.0%GLDDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture99.4%320.8%Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture99.9%144.7%Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta1.002.01Not an edgeHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared1.001.00Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.520.43GLDReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino0.760.63GLDReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.0970.069Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.200.14GLDAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkIAUGLDThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha−0.1% a year−2.8% a yearGLD not significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat−0.57−5.48Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−0.4% to +0.2%−3.8% to −1.8%GLD includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio−0.180.34Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error0.7%16.4%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 932 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

Side by side

GLD SPDR Gold Shares UGL ProShares Ultra Gold
Where it sits Commodity ETF Leveraged ETF
What it is Holds gold +2 times GLD each day
Total return, 1 year +2.5% −8.8%
Its benchmark over the same days +2.7% (IAU) not measured
Gap to its benchmark −0.2 pts vs IAU not measured
Expense ratio 0.40% 0.95%
Net assets, GLD as of Oct 27, 2026 and UGL as of Oct 28, 2026 $135.8bn $672m

GLD and UGL on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-1B71FF1317

GLD and UGL do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?

  1. One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 GLD returned +2.5% and UGL −8.8% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 11.3 points.
  2. Cost. GLD charges 0.40% of assets a year and UGL 0.95%, a gap of 0.55 points.
  3. Size. GLD has $135.8bn in net assets and UGL $680m (net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026); GLD is 199.7 times larger.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

GLD and UGL flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
GLD

Its expense ratio is 0.40% a year, for the three months to Jun 30, 2026, as its 10-Q states.

GLD holds gold. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +2.5% with distributions reinvested, against +2.7% for its benchmark, the price of gold. It sat 24.7% below its high of Jan 29, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

UGL

Over the three months to Oct 28, 2026, UGL lost 1.2%, against −0.1% for twice GLD's daily moves. Of that 2.6, daily compounding is −1.5 points, which any 2 times fund would show over the same path, and the fund itself is −1.1 points against 2 times each day's move, compounded. GLD moved at 24% annualized over that window.

Read the multiple against the whole window instead and 2 times GLD's 0.7% implies +1.4%, which makes UGL look 2.6 points short. That is not the fund's objective, which is daily. UGL aims to return +2 times GLD's move each day, then resets. Over one day it does that. Over longer periods the daily results compound, so the total is not +2 times the period's move: it is lower after a fall and recovery, and can be higher in a steady run. The more it moves, the further the two numbers separate.

Questions people ask

Are GLD and UGL in the same category?
GLD is a commodity ETF and UGL is a leveraged ETF, so they do different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and holdings.
Which returned more over the last year, GLD or UGL?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, GLD returned +2.5% and UGL −8.8%.
Which is cheaper, GLD or UGL?
GLD is cheaper, by 0.55 percentage points a year. That is about $55 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's own filings.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, GLD against UGL, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/gld-vs-ugl

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.