Data as of Nov 4, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

GLD vs KMLM: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, GLD returned +2.8% to KMLM's +16.5%, and GLD charges 0.40% to KMLM's 0.90%.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about GLD and KMLM

Net assets: $131.3bn on Nov 3, 2026 for SPDR Gold Shares, and $586m on Nov 4, 2026 for KraneShares Mount Lucas Managed Futures Index Strategy ETF.

At a glance
+2.8%
GLD total return, 1 year
+16.5%
KMLM total return, 1 year
0.40%
GLD expense ratio
0.90%
KMLM expense ratio

Pair scorecard

GLD costs 0.50 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 13.7 points; GLD is far larger, $135.0bn against $586m.

GLD vs KMLM: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureGLDKMLM
Return
Total return, 1 year+2.8%+16.5%
Total return, 52 weeks+16.6%
Drawdown
Below its high24.9%, high on Jan 29, 2026
Against its benchmark
What it tracksGoldnot published
Treasury bills, 52 weeks+3.7%
Against cash12.9 points ahead
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.40%0.90%
Net assets$135.0bn$586m
Holdings
Holdings in commonnot published
Risk
Correlation with the S&P 500’s weekly returns−0.12
Beta to the S&P 500−0.12: about 0.12% for each 1%
Its average week when the S&P 500 fellrose 0.18%
Down-week capture−16.3%
Weeks the S&P 500 fell26 of 52, by 1.07% on average

Method

Risk and return

Dec 11, 2020 to Oct 30, 2026 · 307 weekly returns
GLD KMLM
Return
Total return edge GLD +106.3% +55.0%
Annualized edge GLD +13.0% +7.7%
Price return edge GLD +106.3% +21.2%
Risk
Volatility edge KMLM 16.4% 13.4%
Max drawdown edge GLD (slight) −26.5% −27.6%
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge GLD 0.63 0.37
Sortino edge GLD 0.94 0.54
Calmar edge GLD 0.49 0.28
Reading

From Dec 2020 to Oct 2026, GLD returned more: +106.3% to +55.0%. KMLM swung less: 13.4% to 16.4%. GLD fell slightly less at its worst: −26.5% to −27.6%.

Full scorecard

9 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: GLD vs KMLM: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureGLDKMLMEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+106.3%+55.0%GLDPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+13.0%+7.7%GLDTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+106.3%+21.2%GLDPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility16.4%13.4%KMLMSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation10.9%9.2%KMLMLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−26.5%−27.6%GLD (slight)Deepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.630.37GLDReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino0.940.54GLDReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Calmar0.490.28GLDAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 307 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

Side by side

GLD SPDR Gold Shares KMLM KraneShares Mount Lucas Managed Futures Index Strategy ETF
Where it sits Commodity ETF Alternatives ETF
What it is Holds gold Managed futures
Total return, 1 year +2.8% +16.5%
Its benchmark over the same days +2.9% (IAU) not measured
Gap to its benchmark −0.1 pts vs IAU not measured
Expense ratio 0.40% 0.90%
Net assets, GLD as of Nov 3, 2026 and KMLM as of Nov 4, 2026 $131.3bn $586m

GLD and KMLM on the fields both publish, as of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief:

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

GLD and KMLM flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
GLD

Its expense ratio is 0.40% a year, for the three months to Jun 30, 2026, as its 10-Q states.

GLD holds gold. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 it returned +2.8% with distributions reinvested, against +2.9% for its benchmark, the price of gold. It sat 24.9% below its high of Jan 29, 2026 on Nov 4, 2026.

KMLM

KMLM is a managed futures fund. ETFIQ measures what every alternatives fund is sold on: whether it moves differently from the stock market. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, its weekly returns had a correlation of −0.12 with the S&P 500’s and a beta of −0.12, so for each 1% the index moved it moved about 0.12% the other way. The S&P 500 fell in 26 of those 52 weeks, by 1.07% on average. In the same weeks KMLM rose 0.18% on average, a down-week capture of −16.3%. Over the same 52 weeks KMLM returned +16.6% and a Treasury bill fund +3.7%, so it finished 12.9 percentage points ahead of cash.

Questions people ask

Are GLD and KMLM in the same category?
GLD is a commodity ETF and KMLM is an alternatives ETF, so they do different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and holdings.
Which returned more over the last year, GLD or KMLM?
In the year to Nov 4, 2026, with distributions reinvested, GLD returned +2.8% and KMLM +16.5%.
Which is cheaper, GLD or KMLM?
GLD is cheaper, by 0.50 percentage points a year. That is about $50 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's own filings.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, GLD against KMLM, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/gld-vs-kmlm

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.