Data as of Nov 4, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

IVV vs KMLM: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, IVV returned +14.8% to KMLM's +16.5%, and IVV charges 0.03% to KMLM's 0.90%.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about IVV and KMLM

Net assets: $872.0bn on Nov 3, 2026 for iShares Core S&P 500 ETF, and $586m on Nov 4, 2026 for KraneShares Mount Lucas Managed Futures Index Strategy ETF.

At a glance
+14.8%
IVV total return, 1 year
+16.5%
KMLM total return, 1 year
0.03%
IVV expense ratio
0.90%
KMLM expense ratio

Pair scorecard

IVV costs 0.87 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 1.7 points; IVV is far larger, $886.8bn against $586m.

IVV vs KMLM: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureIVVKMLM
Return
Total return, 1 year+14.8%+16.5%
Total return, 52 weeks+16.6%
Against its benchmark
What it tracksS&P 500not published
Treasury bills, 52 weeks+3.7%
Against cash12.9 points ahead
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.03%0.90%
Net assets$886.8bn$586m
Holdings
Holdings in commonnot published
In the S&P 500, by weight100%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund37.3%
Risk
Correlation with the S&P 500’s weekly returns−0.12
Beta to the S&P 500−0.12: about 0.12% for each 1%
Its average week when the S&P 500 fellrose 0.18%
Down-week capture−16.3%
Weeks the S&P 500 fell26 of 52, by 1.07% on average

Method

Side by side

IVV iShares Core S&P 500 ETF KMLM KraneShares Mount Lucas Managed Futures Index Strategy ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Alternatives ETF
What it is Tracks the S&P 500 Managed futures
Total return, 1 year +14.8% +16.5%
Its benchmark over the same days +14.8% (SPY) not measured
Gap to its benchmark 0.0 pts vs SPY not measured
Expense ratio 0.03% 0.90%
Holdings 505 not read by ETFIQ
Net assets, IVV as of Nov 3, 2026 and KMLM as of Nov 4, 2026 $872.0bn $586m

IVV and KMLM on the fields both publish, as of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

IVV and KMLM flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
IVV

IVV tracks the S&P 500. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 it returned +14.8% with distributions reinvested, against +14.8% for its benchmark, the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Nov 3, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 505 positions, with the top ten at 37.3%.

KMLM

KMLM is a managed futures fund. ETFIQ measures what every alternatives fund is sold on: whether it moves differently from the stock market. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, its weekly returns had a correlation of −0.12 with the S&P 500’s and a beta of −0.12, so for each 1% the index moved it moved about 0.12% the other way. The S&P 500 fell in 26 of those 52 weeks, by 1.07% on average. In the same weeks KMLM rose 0.18% on average, a down-week capture of −16.3%. Over the same 52 weeks KMLM returned +16.6% and a Treasury bill fund +3.7%, so it finished 12.9 percentage points ahead of cash.

Questions people ask

Are IVV and KMLM in the same category?
IVV is a stock ETF and KMLM is an alternatives ETF, so they do different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and holdings.
Which returned more over the last year, IVV or KMLM?
In the year to Nov 4, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IVV returned +14.8% and KMLM +16.5%.
Which is cheaper, IVV or KMLM?
IVV is cheaper, by 0.87 percentage points a year. That is about $87 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, IVV against KMLM, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ivv-vs-kmlm

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.