Data as of Nov 4, 2026.
GLD vs TFPN: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, GLD returned +2.8% to TFPN's +14.2%, and GLD charges 0.40% to TFPN's 1.13%.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about GLD and TFPN
Net assets: $131.3bn on Nov 3, 2026 for SPDR Gold Shares, and $170m on Jun 30, 2026 for Blueprint Chesapeake Multi-Asset Trend ETF.
Pair scorecard
GLD costs 0.73 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 11.4 points.
| Measure | GLD | TFPN |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +2.8% | +14.2% |
| Total return, 52 weeks | +14.4% | |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 24.9%, high on Jan 29, 2026 | |
| Against its benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Gold | not published |
| Treasury bills, 52 weeks | +3.7% | |
| Against cash | 10.8 points ahead | |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.40% | 1.13% |
| Net assets, GLD as of Nov 3, 2026 and TFPN as of Jun 30, 2026 | $131.3bn | $170m |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | not published | |
| Risk | ||
| Correlation with the S&P 500’s weekly returns | +0.75 | |
| Beta to the S&P 500 | +1.00: about 1.00% for each 1% | |
| Its average week when the S&P 500 fell | fell 1.32% | |
| Down-week capture | 123.6% | |
| Weeks the S&P 500 fell | 26 of 52, by 1.07% on average | |
Risk and return
Jul 21, 2023 to Oct 30, 2026 · 171 weekly returnsEach against its own benchmark: GLD against IAU, Feb 4, 2005 to Oct 30, 2026; TFPN against VOO, Jul 21, 2023 to Oct 30, 2026.
From Jul 2023 to Oct 2026, GLD returned more: +95.3% to +18.9%. TFPN swung less: 10.7% to 18.6%. TFPN fell less at its worst: −15.4% to −26.5%.
Full scorecard
19 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓
| Measure | GLD | TFPN | Edge | How it is measured |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return | ||||
| Total return | +95.3% | +18.9% | GLD | Price change plus distributions, reinvested. |
| Annualized | +22.6% | +5.4% | GLD | Total return as a yearly rate. |
| Price return | +95.3% | +16.7% | GLD | Price change alone, distributions left out. |
| Risk | ||||
| Volatility | 18.6% | 10.7% | TFPN | Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier. |
| Downside deviation | 11.9% | 7.9% | TFPN | Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate. |
| Max drawdown | −26.5% | −15.4% | TFPN | Deepest fall from a high to the low after it. |
| Upside capture | 99.4% | 30.5% | Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose. | |
| Downside capture | 99.9% | 53.6% | Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better. | |
| Beta | 1.00 | 0.38 | Not an edge | How far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves. |
| R squared | 1.00 | 0.25 | Not an edge | Share of its weekly moves its benchmark explains. |
| Risk-adjusted | ||||
| Sharpe | 0.95 | 0.12 | GLD | Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility. |
| Sortino | 1.47 | 0.17 | GLD | Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation. |
| Treynor | 0.096 | 0.035 | Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta. | |
| Calmar | 0.85 | 0.35 | GLD | Annualized return divided by the max drawdown. |
| Against the benchmark | ||||
| Benchmark | IAU | VOO | The ETF each fund is measured against. | |
| Alpha | −0.1% a year | −3.7% a year | Not significant | Yearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts. |
| Alpha t-stat | −0.57 | −0.73 | Not an edge | How sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance. |
| Alpha range | −0.4% to +0.2% | −13.9% to +6.4% | Includes zero | The 95% range for the yearly alpha. |
| Information ratio | −0.18 | −0.95 | Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error. | |
| Tracking error | 0.7% | 12.7% | Not an edge | How far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized. |
Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 171 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.
Side by side
GLD and TFPN on the fields both publish, as of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
Client brief:
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
Its expense ratio is 0.40% a year, for the three months to Jun 30, 2026, as its 10-Q states.
GLD holds gold. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 it returned +2.8% with distributions reinvested, against +2.9% for its benchmark, the price of gold. It sat 24.9% below its high of Jan 29, 2026 on Nov 4, 2026.
TFPN
TFPN is a managed futures fund. ETFIQ measures what every alternatives fund is sold on: whether it moves differently from the stock market. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, its weekly returns had a correlation of +0.75 with the S&P 500’s and a beta of +1.00, so for each 1% the index moved it moved about 1.00% the same way. The S&P 500 fell in 26 of those 52 weeks, by 1.07% on average. In the same weeks TFPN fell 1.32% on average, a down-week capture of 123.6%. Over the same 52 weeks TFPN returned +14.4% and a Treasury bill fund +3.7%, so it finished 10.8 percentage points ahead of cash.
Questions people ask
- Are GLD and TFPN in the same category?
- GLD is a commodity ETF and TFPN is an alternatives ETF, so they do different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and holdings.
- Which returned more over the last year, GLD or TFPN?
- In the year to Nov 4, 2026, with distributions reinvested, GLD returned +2.8% and TFPN +14.2%.
- Which is cheaper, GLD or TFPN?
- GLD is cheaper, by 0.73 percentage points a year. That is about $73 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's own filings.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, GLD against TFPN, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/gld-vs-tfpn
ETFIQ. (Nov 4, 2026). GLD against TFPN. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/gld-vs-tfpn
[GLD against TFPN (ETFIQ, Nov 4, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/gld-vs-tfpn)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.