Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

CTA vs GLD: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, CTA returned +18.4% to GLD's +2.5%, and GLD charges 0.40% to CTA's 0.75%.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about CTA and GLD

Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $1.4bn for Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETF and $135.8bn for SPDR Gold Shares.

At a glance
+18.4%
CTA total return, 1 year
+2.5%
GLD total return, 1 year
0.75%
CTA expense ratio
0.40%
GLD expense ratio

Pair scorecard

GLD costs 0.35 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 15.9 points; GLD is far larger, $135.8bn against $1.4bn.

CTA vs GLD: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureCTAGLD
Return
Total return, 1 year+18.4%+2.5%
Total return, 52 weeks+17.4%
Drawdown
Below its high24.7%, high on Jan 29, 2026
Against its benchmark
What it tracksnot publishedGold
Treasury bills, 52 weeks+3.6%
Against cash13.7 points ahead
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.75%0.40%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$1.4bn$135.8bn
Holdings
Holdings in commonnot published
Risk
Correlation with the S&P 500’s weekly returns−0.19
Beta to the S&P 500−0.36: about 0.36% for each 1%
Its average week when the S&P 500 fellrose 0.40%
Down-week capture−36.1%
Weeks the S&P 500 fell26 of 52, by 1.10% on average

Method

Side by side

CTA Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETF GLD SPDR Gold Shares
Where it sits Alternatives ETF Commodity ETF
What it is Managed futures Holds gold
Total return, 1 year +18.4% +2.5%
Its benchmark over the same days not measured +2.7% (IAU)
Gap to its benchmark not measured −0.2 pts vs IAU
Expense ratio 0.75% 0.40%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 $1.4bn $135.8bn

CTA and GLD on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

GLD flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
CTA

CTA is a managed futures fund. ETFIQ measures what every alternatives fund is sold on: whether it moves differently from the stock market. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, its weekly returns had a correlation of −0.19 with the S&P 500’s and a beta of −0.36, so for each 1% the index moved it moved about 0.36% the other way. The S&P 500 fell in 26 of those 52 weeks, by 1.10% on average. In the same weeks CTA rose 0.40% on average, a down-week capture of −36.1%. Over the same 52 weeks CTA returned +17.4% and a Treasury bill fund +3.6%, so it finished 13.7 percentage points ahead of cash.

GLD

Its expense ratio is 0.40% a year, for the three months to Jun 30, 2026, as its 10-Q states.

GLD holds gold. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +2.5% with distributions reinvested, against +2.7% for its benchmark, the price of gold. It sat 24.7% below its high of Jan 29, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Are CTA and GLD in the same category?
CTA is an alternatives ETF and GLD is a commodity ETF, so they do different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and holdings.
Which returned more over the last year, CTA or GLD?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CTA returned +18.4% and GLD +2.5%.
Which is cheaper, CTA or GLD?
GLD is cheaper, by 0.35 percentage points a year. That is about $35 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's own filings.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, CTA against GLD, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cta-vs-gld

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.