Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

CTA vs SPY: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, CTA returned +18.4% to SPY's +13.6%, and SPY charges 0.09% to CTA's 0.75%.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about CTA and SPY

Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $1.4bn for Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETF and $814.8bn for SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust.

At a glance
+18.4%
CTA total return, 1 year
+13.6%
SPY total return, 1 year
0.75%
CTA expense ratio
0.09%
SPY expense ratio

Pair scorecard

SPY costs 0.66 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 4.8 points; SPY is far larger, $814.8bn against $1.4bn.

CTA vs SPY: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureCTASPY
Return
Total return, 1 year+18.4%+13.6%
Total return, 52 weeks+17.4%
Against its benchmark
What it tracksnot publishedS&P 500 Index
Treasury bills, 52 weeks+3.6%
Against cash13.7 points ahead
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.75%0.09%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$1.4bn$814.8bn
Holdings
Holdings in commonnot published
In the S&P 500, by weight100%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund38.1%
Risk
Correlation with the S&P 500’s weekly returns−0.19
Beta to the S&P 500−0.36: about 0.36% for each 1%
Its average week when the S&P 500 fellrose 0.40%
Down-week capture−36.1%
Weeks the S&P 500 fell26 of 52, by 1.10% on average

Method

Side by side

CTA Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETF SPY SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust
Where it sits Alternatives ETF Stock ETF
What it is Managed futures Tracks the S&P 500
Total return, 1 year +18.4% +13.6%
Its benchmark over the same days not measured +13.7% (VOO)
Gap to its benchmark not measured −0.1 pts vs VOO
Expense ratio 0.75% 0.09%
Holdings not read by ETFIQ 504
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 $1.4bn $814.8bn

CTA and SPY on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

SPY flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
CTA

CTA is a managed futures fund. ETFIQ measures what every alternatives fund is sold on: whether it moves differently from the stock market. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, its weekly returns had a correlation of −0.19 with the S&P 500’s and a beta of −0.36, so for each 1% the index moved it moved about 0.36% the other way. The S&P 500 fell in 26 of those 52 weeks, by 1.10% on average. In the same weeks CTA rose 0.40% on average, a down-week capture of −36.1%. Over the same 52 weeks CTA returned +17.4% and a Treasury bill fund +3.6%, so it finished 13.7 percentage points ahead of cash.

SPY

SPY tracks the S&P 500. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +13.6% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 504 positions, with the top ten at 38.1%.

Questions people ask

Are CTA and SPY in the same category?
CTA is an alternatives ETF and SPY is a stock ETF, so they do different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and holdings.
Which returned more over the last year, CTA or SPY?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CTA returned +18.4% and SPY +13.6%.
Which is cheaper, CTA or SPY?
SPY is cheaper, by 0.66 percentage points a year. That is about $66 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, CTA against SPY, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cta-vs-spy

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.