Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
GBIL vs MINT: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, GBIL returned +3.6% to MINT's +4.2%, and GBIL charges 0.12% to MINT's 0.36%.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about GBIL and MINT
Net assets: $7.9bn on Oct 27, 2026 for Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF, and $16.4bn on Jun 30, 2026 for PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active Exchange-Traded Fund.
Pair scorecard
GBIL costs 0.24 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 0.6 points.
| Measure | GBIL | MINT |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +3.6% | +4.2% |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | FTSE US Treasury 0-1 Year Composite Select Index | No index, actively managed |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.12% | 0.36% |
| Net assets, GBIL as of Oct 27, 2026 and MINT as of Jun 30, 2026 | $7.9bn | $16.4bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | report dates differ | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Aug 31, 2026. Method
Risk and return
Sep 16, 2016 to Oct 23, 2026 · 527 weekly returnsMINT returned more: +31.8% to +26.3%. GBIL swung less: 0.5% to 1.4%. GBIL fell less at its worst: −0.7% to −4.6%.
Full scorecard
9 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓
| Measure | GBIL | MINT | Edge | How it is measured |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return | ||||
| Total return | +26.3% | +31.8% | MINT | Price change plus distributions, reinvested. |
| Annualized | +2.3% | +2.8% | MINT | Total return as a yearly rate. |
| Price return | +0.1% | −0.7% | GBIL | Price change alone, distributions left out. |
| Risk | ||||
| Volatility | 0.5% | 1.4% | GBIL | Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier. |
| Downside deviation | 0.3% | 1.2% | GBIL | Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate. |
| Max drawdown | −0.7% | −4.6% | GBIL | Deepest fall from a high to the low after it. |
| Risk-adjusted | ||||
| Sharpe | −0.40 | 0.17 | MINT | Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility. |
| Sortino | −0.58 | 0.20 | MINT | Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation. |
| Calmar | 3.54 | 0.60 | GBIL | Annualized return divided by the max drawdown. |
Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 527 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.
Side by side
GBIL and MINT on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
GBIL and MINT are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?
- What each follows. GBIL follows FTSE US Treasury 0-1 Year Composite Select Index and MINT follows No index, actively managed.
- Number of holdings. GBIL holds 39 positions and MINT holds 977.
- Cost. GBIL charges 0.12% of assets a year and MINT 0.36%, a gap of 0.24 points.
Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
GBIL
GBIL tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +3.6% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.12% a year.
MINT
MINT is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +4.2% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.36% a year.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, GBIL or MINT?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, GBIL returned +3.6% and MINT +4.2%.
- Which is cheaper, GBIL or MINT?
- GBIL is cheaper, by 0.24 percentage points a year. That is about $24 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, GBIL against MINT, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/gbil-vs-mint
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). GBIL against MINT. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/gbil-vs-mint
[GBIL against MINT (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/gbil-vs-mint)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.