GARP vs NULG: Differences, Returns & Fees
GARP and NULG hold 32% of their weight in the same names, and GARP returned +22.3% over the year. Net assets: $3.6bn on Oct 20, 2026 for iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF, and $2.7bn on Jul 31, 2026 for Nuveen ESG Large-Cap Growth ETF.
GARP costs 0.11 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 10.8 points.
| GARP | NULG | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.15% | 0.26% |
| Net assets, as of Jul 31, 2026 | $2.6bn | $2.7bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +22.3% | +11.5% |
| What it tracks | MSCI USA Quality GARP Select Index | Nuveen ESG USA Large-Cap Growth Index |
| Holdings in common | 32% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 44.0% | 44.0% |
| Below its high | 6.7%, high on Oct 6, 2026 | 6.1%, high on Aug 13, 2026 |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 19, 2026.
GARP and NULG are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?
- What each follows. GARP follows MSCI USA Quality GARP Select Index and NULG follows Nuveen ESG USA Large-Cap Growth Index.
- Holdings in common. 32% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Oct 19, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026).
- One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 20, 2026 GARP returned +22.3% and NULG +11.5% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 10.8 points.
Data as of Oct 20, 2026. The differences are picked by a fixed rule, in a fixed order; the PDF prints it. Page 2 has the returns, overlap, risks and sources.
Take this comparison to a client
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
Not advice. The brief uses the figures on this page, with the data date and a report id. Saved comparisons are listed on your saved page; privacy.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, GARP and NULG hold 32% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 19, 2026.
half
32% in common
On the same fields
GARP and NULG on the fields both publish, as of Oct 20, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
About GARP
GARP tracks the MSCI USA Quality GARP. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +22.3% with distributions reinvested, against +15.4% for its benchmark, the MSCI USA Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 19, 2026, 94% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 131 positions, with the top ten at 44.0%. It sat 6.7% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 20, 2026.
About NULG
NULG tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +11.5% with distributions reinvested, against +15.5% for its benchmark, the MSCI USA Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.26% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 94% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 69 positions, with the top ten at 44.0%. It sat 6.1% below its high of Aug 13, 2026 on Oct 20, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, GARP or NULG?
- In the year to Oct 20, 2026, with distributions reinvested, GARP returned +22.3% and NULG +11.5%.
- Which is cheaper, GARP or NULG?
- GARP is cheaper, by 0.11 percentage points a year. That is about $11 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, GARP against NULG, data as of Oct 20, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/garp-vs-nulg
ETFIQ. (Oct 20, 2026). GARP against NULG. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/garp-vs-nulg
[GARP against NULG (ETFIQ, Oct 20, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/garp-vs-nulg)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.