NULG vs TCHP: Differences, Returns & Fees
NULG and TCHP hold 44% of their weight in the same names, and NULG returned +11.5% over the year. Net assets: $2.7bn on Jul 31, 2026 for Nuveen ESG Large-Cap Growth ETF, and $2.2bn on Oct 20, 2026 for T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth ETF.
NULG costs 0.31 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 9.1 points.
| NULG | TCHP | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.26% | 0.57% |
| Net assets, NULG as of Jul 31, 2026 and TCHP as of Oct 20, 2026 | $2.7bn | $2.2bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +11.5% | +2.4% |
| What it tracks | Nuveen ESG USA Large-Cap Growth Index | No index, actively managed |
| Holdings in common | 44% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 44.0% | 56.7% |
| Below its high | 6.1%, high on Aug 13, 2026 | 5.1%, high on Jun 1, 2026 |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026.
NULG and TCHP are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?
- What each follows. NULG follows Nuveen ESG USA Large-Cap Growth Index and TCHP follows No index, actively managed.
- Holdings in common. 44% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026).
- One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 20, 2026 NULG returned +11.5% and TCHP +2.4% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 9.1 points.
Data as of Oct 20, 2026. The differences are picked by a fixed rule, in a fixed order; the PDF prints it. Page 2 has the returns, overlap, risks and sources.
Take this comparison to a client
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
Not advice. The brief uses the figures on this page, with the data date and a report id. Saved comparisons are listed on your saved page; privacy.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, NULG and TCHP hold 44% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026.
half
44% in common
On the same fields
NULG and TCHP on the fields both publish, as of Oct 20, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
About NULG
NULG tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +11.5% with distributions reinvested, against +15.5% for its benchmark, the MSCI USA Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.26% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 94% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 69 positions, with the top ten at 44.0%. It sat 6.1% below its high of Aug 13, 2026 on Oct 20, 2026.
About TCHP
TCHP is actively managed and tracks no index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.57% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 66 positions, with the top ten at 56.7%. It sat 5.1% below its high of Jun 1, 2026 on Oct 20, 2026.
Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +2.4% with distributions reinvested, against +4.0% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Growth Index.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, NULG or TCHP?
- In the year to Oct 20, 2026, with distributions reinvested, NULG returned +11.5% and TCHP +2.4%.
- Which is cheaper, NULG or TCHP?
- NULG is cheaper, by 0.31 percentage points a year. That is about $31 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, NULG against TCHP, data as of Oct 20, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/nulg-vs-tchp
ETFIQ. (Oct 20, 2026). NULG against TCHP. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/nulg-vs-tchp
[NULG against TCHP (ETFIQ, Oct 20, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/nulg-vs-tchp)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.