Data as of Nov 4, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

FTLS vs IVV: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, FTLS returned +8.5% to IVV's +14.8%, and IVV charges 0.03% to FTLS's 1.38%.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about FTLS and IVV

Net assets on Nov 3, 2026: $2.6bn for First Trust Long/Short Equity and $872.0bn for iShares Core S&P 500 ETF.

At a glance
+8.5%
FTLS total return, 1 year
+14.8%
IVV total return, 1 year
1.38%
FTLS expense ratio
0.03%
IVV expense ratio

Pair scorecard

IVV costs 1.35 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 6.3 points; IVV is far larger, $872.0bn against $2.6bn.

FTLS vs IVV: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureFTLSIVV
Return
Total return, 1 year+8.5%+14.8%
Total return, 52 weeks+7.7%
Against its benchmark
What it tracksnot publishedS&P 500
Treasury bills, 52 weeks+3.7%
Against cash4.1 points ahead
Cost and size
Expense ratio1.38%0.03%
Net assets, as of Nov 3, 2026$2.6bn$872.0bn
Holdings
Holdings in commonnot published
In the S&P 500, by weight100%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund37.3%
Risk
Correlation with the S&P 500’s weekly returns+0.83
Beta to the S&P 500+0.48: about 0.48% for each 1%
Its average week when the S&P 500 fellfell 0.48%
Down-week capture44.7%
Weeks the S&P 500 fell26 of 52, by 1.07% on average

Method

Side by side

FTLS First Trust Long/Short Equity IVV iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Where it sits Alternatives ETF Stock ETF
What it is Long-short equity Tracks the S&P 500
Total return, 1 year +8.5% +14.8%
Its benchmark over the same days +14.8% (VOO) +14.8% (SPY)
Gap to its benchmark −6.3 pts vs VOO 0.0 pts vs SPY
Expense ratio 1.38% 0.03%
Holdings not read by ETFIQ 505
Net assets, as of Nov 3, 2026 $2.6bn $872.0bn

FTLS and IVV on the fields both publish, as of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

FTLS and IVV flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
FTLS

FTLS is a long-short equity fund. ETFIQ measures what every alternatives fund is sold on: whether it moves differently from the stock market. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, its weekly returns had a correlation of +0.83 with the S&P 500’s and a beta of +0.48, so for each 1% the index moved it moved about 0.48% the same way. The S&P 500 fell in 26 of those 52 weeks, by 1.07% on average. In the same weeks FTLS fell 0.48% on average, a down-week capture of 44.7%. Over the same 52 weeks FTLS returned +7.7% and a Treasury bill fund +3.7%, so it finished 4.1 percentage points ahead of cash.

IVV

IVV tracks the S&P 500. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 it returned +14.8% with distributions reinvested, against +14.8% for its benchmark, the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Nov 3, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 505 positions, with the top ten at 37.3%.

Questions people ask

Are FTLS and IVV in the same category?
FTLS is an alternatives ETF and IVV is a stock ETF, so they do different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and holdings.
Which returned more over the last year, FTLS or IVV?
In the year to Nov 4, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FTLS returned +8.5% and IVV +14.8%.
Which is cheaper, FTLS or IVV?
IVV is cheaper, by 1.35 percentage points a year. That is about $135 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, FTLS against IVV, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ftls-vs-ivv

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.