Which returned more over the last year, CLSE or IVV?

In the year to Sep 19, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CLSE returned +33.9% and IVV returned +16.6%, so CLSE returned more.

Which is cheaper, CLSE or IVV?

CLSE charges 1.52% a year and IVV charges 0.03%, so IVV is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Are CLSE and IVV the same kind of fund?

No. CLSE is an alternatives ETF and IVV is an index ETF, so they are built for different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and what each actually holds.

Data as of Sep 19, 2026.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

CLSE vs IVV: how they differ

Over the year CLSE returned more, +33.9% to IVV's +16.6%, and IVV charges 0.03% to CLSE's 1.52%.

Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF.

CLSE and IVV on the fields both publish, as of Sep 19, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	CLSE Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF	IVV iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Where it sits	Alternatives ETF	Core fund
Issuer	Convergence	iShares
What it is	Long-short equity	Tracks the S&P 500
Total return, 1 year	+33.9%	+16.6%
S&P 500 over the same days	+16.6%	+16.6%
Gap to the S&P 500	+17.4 pts	0.0 pts
Expense ratio	1.52%	0.03%
Holdings	not filed	508
Net assets	$614m	$846.6bn

CLSE in plain words

CLSE is a long-short equity fund. ETFIQ measures what every alternatives fund is sold on: whether it moves differently from the stock market. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, its weekly returns had a correlation of +0.63 with the S&P 500’s and a beta of +0.64, so for each 1% the index moved it moved about 0.64% the same way. The S&P 500 fell in 22 of those 52 weeks, by 1.24% on average. In the same weeks CLSE fell 0.45% on average, a down-week capture of 36.5%. Over the same 52 weeks CLSE returned +33.1% and a Treasury bill fund +3.6%, so it finished 29.5 percentage points ahead of cash.

IVV in plain words

IVV tracks the S&P 500. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026 it returned +16.6% with distributions reinvested, against +16.6% for the S&P 500 and +21.8% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Sep 18, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 508 positions, with the top ten at 38.5%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, CLSE or IVV?: In the year to Sep 19, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CLSE returned +33.9% and IVV returned +16.6%, so CLSE returned more.
Which is cheaper, CLSE or IVV?: CLSE charges 1.52% a year and IVV charges 0.03%, so IVV is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Are CLSE and IVV the same kind of fund?: No. CLSE is an alternatives ETF and IVV is an index ETF, so they are built for different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and what each actually holds.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

CLSE against IVV, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 19, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, CLSE against IVV, data as of Sep 19, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/clse-vs-ivv Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources