Data as of Nov 4, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

CBLS vs IVV: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, CBLS returned +1.2% to IVV's +14.8%, and IVV charges 0.03% to CBLS's 1.89%.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about CBLS and IVV

Net assets: $56m on Jul 31, 2026 for Clough Hedged Equity ETF, and $872.0bn on Nov 3, 2026 for iShares Core S&P 500 ETF.

At a glance
+1.2%
CBLS total return, 1 year
+14.8%
IVV total return, 1 year
1.89%
CBLS expense ratio
0.03%
IVV expense ratio

Pair scorecard

IVV costs 1.86 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 13.6 points.

CBLS vs IVV: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureCBLSIVV
Return
Total return, 1 year+1.2%+14.8%
Total return, 52 weeks+1.1%
Against its benchmark
What it tracksnot publishedS&P 500
Treasury bills, 52 weeks+3.7%
Against cash2.5 points behind
Cost and size
Expense ratio1.89%0.03%
Net assets, CBLS as of Jul 31, 2026 and IVV as of Nov 3, 2026$56m$872.0bn
Holdings
Holdings in commonnot published
In the S&P 500, by weight100%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund37.3%
Risk
Correlation with the S&P 500’s weekly returns+0.59
Beta to the S&P 500+0.97: about 0.97% for each 1%
Its average week when the S&P 500 fellfell 1.61%
Down-week capture150.0%
Weeks the S&P 500 fell26 of 52, by 1.07% on average

Method

Side by side

CBLS Clough Hedged Equity ETF IVV iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Where it sits Alternatives ETF Stock ETF
What it is Long-short equity Tracks the S&P 500
Total return, 1 year +1.2% +14.8%
Its benchmark over the same days not measured +14.8% (SPY)
Gap to its benchmark not measured 0.0 pts vs SPY
Expense ratio 1.89% 0.03%
Holdings not read by ETFIQ 505
Net assets, CBLS as of Jul 31, 2026 and IVV as of Nov 3, 2026 $56m $872.0bn

CBLS and IVV on the fields both publish, as of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

IVV flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
CBLS

CBLS is a long-short equity fund. ETFIQ measures what every alternatives fund is sold on: whether it moves differently from the stock market. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, its weekly returns had a correlation of +0.59 with the S&P 500’s and a beta of +0.97, so for each 1% the index moved it moved about 0.97% the same way. The S&P 500 fell in 26 of those 52 weeks, by 1.07% on average. In the same weeks CBLS fell 1.61% on average, a down-week capture of 150.0%. Over the same 52 weeks CBLS returned +1.1% and a Treasury bill fund +3.7%, so it finished 2.5 percentage points behind cash.

IVV

IVV tracks the S&P 500. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 it returned +14.8% with distributions reinvested, against +14.8% for its benchmark, the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Nov 3, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 505 positions, with the top ten at 37.3%.

Questions people ask

Are CBLS and IVV in the same category?
CBLS is an alternatives ETF and IVV is a stock ETF, so they do different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and holdings.
Which returned more over the last year, CBLS or IVV?
In the year to Nov 4, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CBLS returned +1.2% and IVV +14.8%.
Which is cheaper, CBLS or IVV?
IVV is cheaper, by 1.86 percentage points a year. That is about $186 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, CBLS against IVV, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cbls-vs-ivv

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.